Topic Sponsor
2004 - 2008 Ford F150 General discussion on the 2004 - 2008 Ford F150 truck.

SuperCharger or ProCharger

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-17-2013, 12:32 PM
  #1  
Member
Thread Starter
 
lwcountryboyz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 41
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default SuperCharger or ProCharger

I own a 2005 F-150 FX4 with 5.4l triton 3v, 15" lift, 22" Fuel Hostage wheels, 40" Interco M16 tires, 4:88 gears front and rear, OBX Racing stainless steel long tube headers with high flow resonators, super 44 Flowmaster, cold air intake, PHP programmer, 130,000 miles, all stock internals. Truck drives 75 mph on highway at 2300 rpms. Looking to get some more power out of her without opening up the motor. I'd be fine with 8-10 pounds of boost. Just not sure which route to go. Any opinions would be great. Thanks.
Old 04-18-2013, 08:41 AM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
CHICKS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 253
Received 38 Likes on 35 Posts

Default

Do you mean "roots blower" or "Centrifugal force" ?
Old 04-18-2013, 09:06 AM
  #3  
Member
Thread Starter
 
lwcountryboyz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 41
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Centrifugal force
Old 04-18-2013, 09:42 AM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
Tommy1005's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 139
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

honestly I wouldn't waste my money supercharging a motor with 130,000 miles on it. For how many of those miles has it been lifted that much? Those big tires with the addition of a supercharger will kill your transmission. I went through 2 in 80,000 miles on a 2wd 2008 crew cab with the Roush supercharger on it and the first one was within the first 20,000 miles.

I would save up for a new motor, then add the saleen supercharger on top of the new motor. With those big tires you need torque to move it and a centrifugal needs rpm to make boost, where as the roots style will make all the boost basically from idle. The Roush setup was ok, but if my truck had not come with it I would've gone with the Saleen setup. The Saleen is a more modern supercharger system than the Roush. The Roush is a similar setup to the one that came on the 99-04 Lightnings.
Old 04-18-2013, 10:00 AM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
NGA PLZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 134
Received 16 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

lol i was confused about the title question , but now i see what you meant. Not having forged internals and a high compression ratio could put a damper on how much power you want to get out of it. I'd put a whipple on top with some bigger injectors and a custom tune. 8-9 psi should put you around 400 whp with pump gas and regular non-150 lbs tires ha.
Old 04-18-2013, 11:13 AM
  #6  
Member
 
pcjordan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Marshall, Michigan
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by lwcountryboyz
Centrifugal force
What Chicks meant is that procharger is a form of supercharging that uses centrifugal force vs Eaton's Root system.

I agree with the other posts.

Your internals will not be able to hold up to the output of the supercharging. And the engine power gained will not make it down to your wheels.

I'm biased as I work for Eaton, but a roots charger is the only way to go if you're so inclined on your existing motor.

For best performance and less headache, I agree with Tommy and get TVS Supercharger. This is Eaton's newest technology since the roots system. This system is also on the Corvette, Camaro, Cad CTSV and Jaguar.

Your issue at the end of the day is always going to be how much torque you get to the wheels. So if doing a motor swap anyway just get a naturally aspirated V10

Last edited by pcjordan; 04-22-2013 at 08:30 AM.
Old 04-18-2013, 12:08 PM
  #7  
Member
Thread Starter
 
lwcountryboyz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 41
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Lift wheels and tires were all put on at 90,000. Trans rebuilt wouldn't be an issue so not to worried about that. Was looking at an intercooled whipple twin screw.
Old 04-18-2013, 12:17 PM
  #8  
Member
 
pcjordan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Marshall, Michigan
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by lwcountryboyz
Lift wheels and tires were all put on at 90,000. Trans rebuilt wouldn't be an issue so not to worried about that. Was looking at an intercooled whipple twin screw.
supercharger will put lots of pressure on your stock valves, lifters and rings.

Charging HP increase will not equal torque/speed you are looking for
Old 04-18-2013, 01:59 PM
  #9  
Member
Thread Starter
 
lwcountryboyz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 41
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by pcjordan

supercharger will put lots of pressure on your stock valves, lifters and rings.

Charging HP increase will not equal torque/speed you are looking for
So what do you recommend?
Old 04-18-2013, 02:40 PM
  #10  
Senior Member

 
ymeski56's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Long Beach Calimexifornia
Posts: 58,557
Received 1,162 Likes on 647 Posts

Default

Moved to 04'-08' section.


Quick Reply: SuperCharger or ProCharger



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:05 PM.