Topic Sponsor
2004 - 2008 Ford F150 General discussion on the 2004 - 2008 Ford F150 truck.

Supercharger ideas

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-01-2011, 04:33 PM
  #11  
speed freek
 
jcfast150's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: mass.
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

the super charger is great i have one on an 06 the reflash from roush will not change thestock rev limiter or the speed limiter sct flash programer and dyno shop will
Old 07-01-2011, 09:30 PM
  #12  
Junior Member
 
07thommi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Blown Ford
Spacer is worthless wether your naturally aspirated or forced induction. You will need custom tuning for your supercharged application. And that Airaid CAI is worthless as well. No offense, I had one myself. Hot air intake is more like. More gaps and openings for the engine bay air to get in then anything I've ever seen. Besides the Roush blower comes with its own tuning and CAI, as do the Whipple and Saleen which are both far superior to the heat breathing Roush. The stuff you have now is not made to work with a blower. Sell it on ebay to the next sucker. A supercharger is a whole new ball game. Big kid toys now buddy.

I am new to the F-150 scene and am looking at purchasing one...so I was curious as to why you believe the Whipple and Saleen superchargers are better than the Rousch superchargers...just looking for more information and opinions...

Thanks,
-mt-
Old 07-01-2011, 10:21 PM
  #13  
12 Second Truck
 
Blown Ford's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: NC
Posts: 1,931
Received 131 Likes on 106 Posts

Red face

Originally Posted by 07thommi
I am new to the F-150 scene and am looking at purchasing one...so I was curious as to why you believe the Whipple and Saleen superchargers are better than the Rousch superchargers...just looking for more information and opinions...

Thanks,
-mt-
Well let's start with efficiency. It takes 20 less hp to operate the twin screw at 8psi at wot. At 10psi it takes 23-25hp and .9 lbs less fuel per minute to spin the Whipple twin screw blower at wot. That's 20 more hp going to the wheels and less fuel being burned. This is at 10psi. The gap grows considerably as you increase boost. The Roush or eaton roots blower produces a considerably higher amount of heat than a twin screw blower. All blowers create heat and increase intake air temps but no blower gets hotter than an eaton roots. Heat causes detonation and that burns pistons. For example you can push the stock 5.4 to 500rwhp with a twin screw. You can only push one to 460rwhp with an eaton. The reason of course being that 20+ of those HP are being wasted driving the blower and the rest is in timing you can't add due to heat and detonation. These figures are based on a 12psi setup.

The next difference is in power output. Both blowers will produce stunning torque very low in the rpms. The twin screw however will hit peak boost sooner and doesn't require any wind up to produce full boost. The Eaton requires very little wind up and again is a power monster at lower rpms. It begins to give up a lot sooner though. By mid range the power output of the twin screw exceeds that of the eaton on the same boost and this increase continues to the red line. Think of it this way...there's a reason the lightning guys ditch there blowers for Kenne Bell and Whipple.

So when it comes down to it the reasons I chose the Whipple were efficiency, power, less fuel, and cost. The blowers are very close in price.

Last edited by Blown Ford; 07-01-2011 at 10:26 PM.
Old 07-01-2011, 10:29 PM
  #14  
Senior Member
 
07FX2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 544
Received 19 Likes on 18 Posts
Default

And blown ford makes more reasons to buy whipple.



Quick Reply: Supercharger ideas



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:55 PM.