Topic Sponsor
2004 - 2008 Ford F150 General discussion on the 2004 - 2008 Ford F150 truck.

Supercharger

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-14-2010, 12:20 AM
  #21  
FOR SALE!!!
 
Ruben7520's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default






Thats allll I have to say...
Old 07-14-2010, 12:41 AM
  #22  
Senior Member
 
Sweiger68's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Superior, WI
Posts: 269
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Ruben7520





Thats allll I have to say...
HOTT DAMN!!! That's sweet!!!
Old 07-14-2010, 04:00 AM
  #23  
Member
 
Cali_Screw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Ruben7520





Thats allll I have to say...

What kind of rwhp/rwtq you making?
Old 07-15-2010, 07:02 AM
  #24  
FOR SALE!!!
 
Ruben7520's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Stock 183 whp on Diablo sport 93 performance tune.

Dyno Tuned @ National Speed in Wilmington NC.
329 whp / 345 wtq.

+85% increase
Old 07-15-2010, 07:27 AM
  #25  
Senior Member
 
CrashTECH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Cleveland, OH
Posts: 1,212
Received 30 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

How much $$ did that run you?
Old 07-15-2010, 07:29 AM
  #26  
Registered User


iTrader: (2)
 
kozal01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: West Michigan
Posts: 9,107
Received 1,390 Likes on 664 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Ruben7520
Stock 183 whp on Diablo sport 93 performance tune.
theres no way that 5.4 only put 183 to the rear wheels stock. my 4.0 V6 in my ranger puts that down to the rear wheels with a tune. who ever dyno'd that didnt do something right.
Old 07-15-2010, 11:04 AM
  #27  
BLOWN club
 
RoushNitemare's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Torrance CA
Posts: 4,477
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

probably just trying to make the gains look huge lol
Old 07-15-2010, 04:57 PM
  #28  
FOR SALE!!!
 
Ruben7520's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Uh actually 183 horsepower at the wheels isn't too bad for a heavy *** truck on 35's. You have to think those trucks only come with 300hp at the crank. All that drivetrain and tire weight reduces your actual "wheel" horse power by a lot. But then again that's just my truck
Old 07-15-2010, 05:42 PM
  #29  
Member
 
VanoFord's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: The Woodlands, Tx
Posts: 1,814
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by kozal01
theres no way that 5.4 only put 183 to the rear wheels stock. my 4.0 V6 in my ranger puts that down to the rear wheels with a tune. who ever dyno'd that didnt do something right.
Dude, your rangers power-to-weight ratio is FAR greater than a 5.4 stock, so you should be able to put down far better numbers. Plus, you do lose atleast 25-35% through the drivetrain from the crank to the wheels.
Old 07-15-2010, 06:11 PM
  #30  
Registered User


iTrader: (2)
 
kozal01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: West Michigan
Posts: 9,107
Received 1,390 Likes on 664 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Ruben7520
Uh actually 183 horsepower at the wheels isn't too bad for a heavy *** truck on 35's. You have to think those trucks only come with 300hp at the crank. All that drivetrain and tire weight reduces your actual "wheel" horse power by a lot. But then again that's just my truck
im turning 33" tires with a 4.0 V6. i still dont believe that you were losing almost 50 percent of your HP at the rear wheels and if you were than something was wrong with your truck.

Originally Posted by VanoFord
Dude, your rangers power-to-weight ratio is FAR greater than a 5.4 stock, so you should be able to put down far better numbers. Plus, you do lose atleast 25-35% through the drivetrain from the crank to the wheels.
weight means nothing on a dyno.

Last edited by kozal01; 07-15-2010 at 06:14 PM.


Quick Reply: Supercharger



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:50 AM.