autospring vs HBS
#11
Senior Member
like i said autosprings has the patent so HBS would have to pay AS to use their design, and if your UCA rubs the strut you dont have a offset design
#12
Senior Member
http://www.hellbentsteel.com/catalog...it/category/5/
#13
Senior Member
I don't have mine installed yet, I am actually waiting on them. I bought them yesterday off ebay for $65.00. I spent hours reading reviews before I decided and seen the design that HBS has ( kinda the hexogon shaped ) and went with that one. I didn't see anything bad about the AS kit, I just noticed how many people had HBS with good luck. Especially with that design to keep from rubbing. Not arguing here either but I don't have physical proof as of yet.
http://www.hellbentsteel.com/catalog...it/category/5/
http://www.hellbentsteel.com/catalog...it/category/5/
#16
#18
Senior Member
i dont see how gussets could be weaker, and my welds are great, did they actually have the product in hand? you cant tell much from a picture, anyways i think AS is better you think HBS is better i guess we can leave it at that, or we will argue for hours on end
#19
But,since they don't typically see extreme useage,they should both be fine.
#20
Senior Member
Its the gussets that make them weaker. Because they arent necessary. What they did is a very common,bad practice. Over-engineering. When you add unnecessary welds,you also add unnecessary HAZs,or heat affected zones. With the gussets they used,they could have made the spacer from 10ga steel,and still be good.
But,since they don't typically see extreme useage,they should both be fine.
But,since they don't typically see extreme useage,they should both be fine.