Topic Sponsor
2009 - 2014 Ford F150 General discussion on 2009 - 2014 Ford F150 truck.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

New Purchase Advice

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-22-2014, 08:05 PM
  #31  
Retired and loving it!

 
Adobe2X's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Spokane, WA
Posts: 4,810
Received 536 Likes on 398 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by CreepinDeth

My only advice, is to buy an early production 2014 at the year end clearance when they heavily liquidate inventory. They will knock 10K off the sticker prices for the upper echelon models. I wouldn't buy a late production 2014 because of the pressure to get the 2015 tooling done could mean lack of proper QC in production.
I guess that could be true (I have a very late Kansas City truck made while the Deaborn factory was shut down and being converted).............but I really think that what you express is not a concern because they don't do both production and 2015 model year line conversion at the same time and same place.
Ford kept producing the 2014 in Kansas while converting the Dearborn line, then once 2014 production shut down in mid September, they officially started 2015 production in Dearborn while converting Kansas City's line to the 2015.
The following users liked this post:
Wanted33 (11-23-2014)
Old 11-23-2014, 02:56 PM
  #32  
Five-0 Ret.
 
Wanted33's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Down South in Dixie
Posts: 5,726
Received 674 Likes on 578 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by exploreco
Thank you for all of the replies. To answer some of the questions.


I appreciate the help. The discussion helps me since I have not owned a truck before and all of the different towing numbers, axle numbers, payload numbers, lock or non locking axle has all been a little over whelming. When I started looking, all I thought I wanted was a crew cab 4x4. I thought the hardest part was going to be deciding on the color. Nope,

[MENTION=196583]exploreco[/MENTION], I can understand how all this can get confusing, but don't overthink the situation. With the weights you are speaking of, and even if you move up to the 6000 lbs either engine with the standard gearing will serve you well. Now, you can go back to picking the color. I found that to be the hardest thing for me also. Good luck.

Remember, darker colors show the dirt more, lighter colors don't. And most importantly, if momma ain't happy nobodies happy.

Last edited by Wanted33; 11-23-2014 at 02:59 PM.
Old 11-24-2014, 10:27 PM
  #33  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
exploreco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Central IL
Posts: 167
Received 19 Likes on 19 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Wanted33

[MENTION=196583]exploreco[/MENTION], I can understand how all this can get confusing, but don't overthink the situation. With the weights you are speaking of, and even if you move up to the 6000 lbs either engine with the standard gearing will serve you well. Now, you can go back to picking the color. I found that to be the hardest thing for me also. Good luck.

Remember, darker colors show the dirt more, lighter colors don't. And most importantly, if momma ain't happy nobodies happy.
Thanks, and your right if momma aint happy aint nobody happy. That is how she ended up with a black car last time. And I am always cleaning that thing. She is partial to the Blue Jeans and that is really nice looking when clean so will see what we can find.
Old 11-29-2014, 06:45 AM
  #34  
Senior Member
 
OMAC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 543
Received 57 Likes on 43 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by dcrabby
INMHO, the 5.0L is the way to go. I really like the "seat of the pants" feel of power waitiing to be used in normal driving & the feel of that power released when I occasionally go to WOT pass. I don't tow often, but when I hook up my trailer w/tractor (9000 gross), the truck hardly knows it. I tow that from 4300 ft to 7300 ft altitude on 4-6% grades using Tow/Haul & OD --- I rarely have to intercede. And, I don't have to wait in the "slow" lane when I want pass slow moving traffic. And, engine & trans temps stay in the safe range. We drove across Nevada and Utah maintaining 80-85 mph (wife driving). I don't pay much attention to MPG, but we avg'd slightly over 20 for the entire trip (Albuquerque NM to Salem OR & return. Best was 24+ across Nevada. Me driving.
So you've never tried the Eco? No need to answer since it's so obvious
Old 11-29-2014, 10:41 AM
  #35  
Opinionated Blowhard
 
Kenferg1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Knoxville, TN
Posts: 1,007
Received 165 Likes on 104 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by dcrabby
INMHO, the 5.0L is the way to go. I really like the "seat of the pants" feel of power waitiing to be used in normal driving & the feel of that power released when I occasionally go to WOT pass. I don't tow often, but when I hook up my trailer w/tractor (9000 gross), the truck hardly knows it. I tow that from 4300 ft to 7300 ft altitude on 4-6% grades using Tow/Haul & OD --- I rarely have to intercede. And, I don't have to wait in the "slow" lane when I want pass slow moving traffic. And, engine & trans temps stay in the safe range. We drove across Nevada and Utah maintaining 80-85 mph (wife driving). I don't pay much attention to MPG, but we avg'd slightly over 20 for the entire trip (Albuquerque NM to Salem OR & return. Best was 24+ across Nevada. Me driving.
You should call Detroit immediately, as they will want to examine this wonder truck 5.0L engine that propels a 5800 pound truck at between 80-85 mph and gets 20+ mpg. That, sir, is a miracle!
Old 11-29-2014, 11:30 AM
  #36  
Senior Member
 
king nothing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 1,231
Received 169 Likes on 137 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Kenferg1

You should call Detroit immediately, as they will want to examine this wonder truck 5.0L engine that propels a 5800 pound truck at between 80-85 mph and gets 20+ mpg. That, sir, is a miracle!
So that's my problem with fuel mileage. Im not going fast enough lol
Old 11-29-2014, 12:49 PM
  #37  
Wyatt
 
meaz93's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 1,373
Received 163 Likes on 136 Posts
Default

Towing a 6-7% grade pulling 9k and your getting 20 mpg average towing with a 5.0. That's a nice thought (dream), cause my Boost doesn't get close to that. Maybe if I consider unhook in the trailer and then calculating mileage...yeah that's got to be it! Or your towing downhill all the way?
Old 11-30-2014, 09:02 AM
  #38  
Senior Member
 
dcrabby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Tijeras, NM
Posts: 305
Received 30 Likes on 28 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Kenferg1
You should call Detroit immediately, as they will want to examine this wonder truck 5.0L engine that propels a 5800 pound truck at between 80-85 mph and gets 20+ mpg. That, sir, is a miracle!

Well, I deserve the jokes! That was not well written by me. As you might have figured out those were multiple "events" over a period of time lumped together.
I'll do better next time!
The following users liked this post:
Kenferg1 (11-30-2014)
Old 11-30-2014, 10:54 AM
  #39  
Member
 
Rockstar_Weldor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Spruce Grove, Alberta
Posts: 70
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

To the OP. I have friends with both EB and 5.0 we all get the same fuel economy except for the ones that drive like they are 16. Both are good engines. If you are towing and already talking about buying a bigger camper get a truck with 3.73s instead of the 3.55s. If I remember correctly I am sure I will be corrected if I am wrong a 2000lb difference in what it is rated for towing.
Old 12-01-2014, 12:36 AM
  #40  
Senior Member
 
RubyFX4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 1,098
Received 362 Likes on 231 Posts

Default

Hold out a couple years and I'm sure you'll be able to get the 2.0 ecoboost that's in my wife's escape, and truck trend will drive it and say it feels just as powerful as the 3.5! (aka 2.7 lol)!!


Quick Reply: New Purchase Advice



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:37 AM.