Topic Sponsor
2009 - 2014 Ford F150 General discussion on 2009 - 2014 Ford F150 truck.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

5.0 vs 5.4

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-08-2012, 10:21 AM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
jcartertn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 1,257
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts

Default 5.0 vs 5.4

What's your opinion between the 2 engines? And do you think it was a good idea on fords part to leave the 5.4?
Old 02-08-2012, 11:07 AM
  #2  
Member
 
therealdash's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

What do you mean by...leave the 5.4?
Old 02-08-2012, 11:09 AM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
murdr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 247
Received 10 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

the 5.0 is a stronger motor , but the 5.4 was built with towing in mind. for example a lot of the torque and hp comes on at around 2500 rpm while the 5.0 hp and torque comes a lil higher in the power band. Ford still uses it in the expedition and it gets around 16-17mpgs
Old 02-08-2012, 11:15 AM
  #4  
Member
 
therealdash's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by murdr
the 5.0 is a stronger motor , but the 5.4 was built with towing in mind. for example a lot of the torque and hp comes on at around 2500 rpm while the 5.0 hp and torque comes a lil higher in the power band. Ford still uses it in the expedition and it gets around 16-17mpgs
Well.....there ya go.
Old 02-08-2012, 12:13 PM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
Hondafan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 884
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

The 5.4 is a dinosaur compared to the 5.0. 'Nough said. The 5.4 has zero advantages in comparison. Though the E boost gets all the cred ( I have one) the 5.0 is almost equivalent with the Eboost having a clear advantage only form the towing perspective. They provide almost the same MPGs in testing. If you want to save a few bucks the 5.0 is a fine choice. The 5.4 is something Ford probably wants to forget, badly outclassed by its rivals in the day and very inferior to the new lineup, thirsty and weak.
The following users liked this post:
yotehunter (04-28-2014)
Old 02-08-2012, 12:39 PM
  #6  
Flatlander
 
smurfs_of_war's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 3,207
Received 283 Likes on 197 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Hondafan
The 5.4 is a dinosaur compared to the 5.0. 'Nough said. The 5.4 has zero advantages in comparison. Though the E boost gets all the cred ( I have one) the 5.0 is almost equivalent with the Eboost having a clear advantage only form the towing perspective. They provide almost the same MPGs in testing. If you want to save a few bucks the 5.0 is a fine choice. The 5.4 is something Ford probably wants to forget, badly outclassed by its rivals in the day and very inferior to the new lineup, thirsty and weak.

My dinosaur does have:

  1. Enough HP and Torque to tow whatever I want that is towable by a half ton with a great torque curve for towing through the city.
  2. Not terrible mileage, but not great
  3. 15 years or so of history and development
  4. easy to find and cheap after market parts
  5. A great V8 sound that the ecoboob cannot match
My dinosaur does not have:


  1. Random shudders at 55-60 MPH
  2. Starting issues
  3. Weird misfires depending on humidity indexes
  4. The uncanny habit of going into limp mode at the most inopportune times.
  5. Random leaks yet to be explained.
  6. high 300's in the HP and torque categories- and I do admit I covet that a little.
  7. The EPA ratings of the newer offerings, although I think many are quite surprised now with their real world fuel economy after their purchase
While I will agree with you- the 5.4 is technologically dated compared to the other two you have listed, I still think it is a strong engine, great for it's purpose as a pack mule, and still has life in it no matter what. When the 5.0 and the ecoboob start turning 300,000+ then I will agree they are far superior beyond the HP and Torque numbers. Incidentally- the 5.4 is absolutely not an inferior engine compared to the 5.3. Have you ever put the two side by side when really working them or towing? The 5.3 is more of a dog than any of them. Given the choice between the 5.0 and the hot water six if I were buying a new truck now? The 5.0 all the way- definitely an awesome engine.



TL; DR- don't hack on the old guy until you're absolutely certain he is good and dead, because he might be the one towing you back after all your great and wonderful technology breaks.
The following 9 users liked this post by smurfs_of_war:
Dunderton (03-30-2016), GotHonks? (10-30-2014), Heretic (10-31-2014), Joshua.Tepz (10-31-2014), Kean (01-30-2017), matt150 (01-27-2020), mojobandit (03-01-2014), Raven2210 (04-18-2014), yotehunter (04-28-2014) and 4 others liked this post. (Show less...)
Old 02-08-2012, 12:51 PM
  #7  
Ford Freak
 
fordfan77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Big Spring, Texas
Posts: 2,078
Received 171 Likes on 106 Posts
Default

Take the 5.4, give it the high compression of the 5.0, the 4 valve heads like the 5.0, and an aluminum block like the 5.0, then you would have a strong lightweight 5.4.

The Lincoln Navigator 5.4 was built with 4 valve heads and made more power than the Ford 5.4.

Really there is no real comparison between the 5.4 and 5.0. They are apples and oranges different.
Old 02-08-2012, 12:54 PM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
Fishhawk460's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 305
Likes: 0
Received 22 Likes on 11 Posts

Default

Since I have not driven a truck or car with the 5.0 I really can't compare. However there is one thing that I know is fact. The 4.6/5.4 engine is a long lasting tough engine. And for me thats all I need. I didn't buy my truck to run fast quarter mile times. I have an old Mustang for that with a true dinosour 5.0.
I work in downtown Chicago and the best example of these modular engines is all the old beat up Crown Victoria cab's running around. They all have over 200k miles, are not well maintained, and beat to he11 in the worst driving conditions possible. But they keep running and running and running. Nuff said!
The following users liked this post:
Kean (01-30-2017)
Old 02-08-2012, 12:55 PM
  #9  
Let the Fun Begin
 
TimelessR1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: North Jersey
Posts: 1,167
Likes: 0
Received 69 Likes on 58 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by smurfs_of_war
My dinosaur does have:

  1. Enough HP and Torque to tow whatever I want that is towable by a half ton with a great torque curve for towing through the city.
  2. Not terrible mileage, but not great
  3. 15 years or so of history and development
  4. easy to find and cheap after market parts
  5. A great V8 sound that the ecoboob cannot match
My dinosaur does not have:


  1. Random shudders at 55-60 MPH
  2. Starting issues
  3. Weird misfires depending on humidity indexes
  4. The uncanny habit of going into limp mode at the most inopportune times.
  5. Random leaks yet to be explained.
  6. high 300's in the HP and torque categories- and I do admit I covet that a little.
  7. The EPA ratings of the newer offerings, although I think many are quite surprised now with their real world fuel economy after their purchase
While I will agree with you- the 5.4 is technologically dated compared to the other two you have listed, I still think it is a strong engine, great for it's purpose as a pack mule, and still has life in it no matter what. When the 5.0 and the ecoboob start turning 300,000+ then I will agree they are far superior beyond the HP and Torque numbers. Incidentally- the 5.4 is absolutely not an inferior engine compared to the 5.3. Have you ever put the two side by side when really working them or towing? The 5.3 is more of a dog than any of them. Given the choice between the 5.0 and the hot water six if I were buying a new truck now? The 5.0 all the way- definitely an awesome engine.



TL; DR- don't hack on the old guy until you're absolutely certain he is good and dead, because he might be the one towing you back after all your great and wonderful technology breaks.


+1

My dinosaur moves my 35's just nicely while still getting good MPG
The following 3 users liked this post by TimelessR1:
Joshua.Tepz (10-31-2014), matt150 (01-27-2020), screw4us (01-15-2016)
Old 02-08-2012, 01:04 PM
  #10  
Member
 
1MEANGT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 76
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

I bought my 2010 FX4 a few months ago and love it. Could I have purchased a 2011 for a little more? Sure I could have. But I think the 5.4 is a great motor that has been proven time and time again. To say it is a dinosaur is lame. And after reading about all the issues with the EcoBoost I am happy with the decision I have made.

I bought my truck as a DD and to tow my Mustang with when I am racing. Not to race my DD.


Quick Reply: 5.0 vs 5.4



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:16 PM.