Topic Sponsor
2009 - 2014 Ford F150 General discussion on 2009 - 2014 Ford F150 truck.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

3.55 or 3.73 with ecoboost

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-09-2011, 08:03 AM
  #21  
Member
 
bfourjs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 75
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

You are going to be great either way. I have a 2011 6.5 screw with 3.55 and pull a 5200# boat. It pulls great and I have never had any regrets going with the 3.55. I you do primary driving and some random towing my vote is for the 3.55. If you plan to add larger tires at any time then I say get the 3.73. Just my thoughts.
Old 11-09-2011, 08:17 AM
  #22  
Senior Member
 
69428SCJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: North Texas
Posts: 647
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Kenneth Forbus
It might only be a extra hundred rpms but you constantly running that over the coarse of your vehicles life. The 3.55 will see around 19-20 mpg and 3.73 will get 17 mpg. 2 mpg extra gives you 50 more miles per tank. For me that's over 1000 extra miles per year. Anyway good luck with your choice!

My sides are killing me from the laughter. Where is your proof on this?? I can lower my RPM's by a couple of hundred and reduce my aero drag by 15-20% by simply slowing from 72 to 65 and only pick up .5mpg. That is a way bigger change than a 3.73 to 3.55 gear change. A 5% gear change up or down will never equate to 2-3 mpg in these trucks. NO WAY...EVER! You sound like one of those diesel drivers who say they get 25 mpg.

My truck routinely gets 20 mpg all day long on the freeway with the 3.73's. The only time it has even been close to 17 was running into a 30mph headwind when it was around 18. Same wind coming back it was almost 24. I've driven both trucks and the mileage was within a few tenths.
Old 11-09-2011, 08:20 AM
  #23  
Senior Member
 
69428SCJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: North Texas
Posts: 647
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by EricTheOracle
It really does matter.
Please elaborate....Are you saying 2-3 mpg better as well with the 3.55's?? I agree there is a difference in mileage.... measured in tenths. There is no way that it is 2-3 mpg.
Old 11-09-2011, 08:48 AM
  #24  
Senior Member/Vietnam Vet
 
SkiSmuggs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Northern Vermont
Posts: 2,603
Received 539 Likes on 369 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Brambo_atx
Thanks. I was wondering if the mileage difference when empty was big between the two. If it isn't much, I'll order the 3.73 since the main reason for the new truck is better towing with the boat ( and hopefully better empty mileage).
I have a 4x4 Max Tow EB with 3.73 and just filled my first tank with 18.8 average mpg. Go for it.
Old 11-09-2011, 08:49 AM
  #25  
Senior Member
 
lddrew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: GA
Posts: 888
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The e-locker would be worth it IMO, had ****ty experience with ford's LSD
Old 11-09-2011, 01:21 PM
  #26  
Member
Thread Starter
 
Brambo_atx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Thanks for all of the info and advice. I appreciate it.
Old 11-12-2011, 07:46 PM
  #27  
Senior Member
 
Mike Up's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 3,067
Received 531 Likes on 395 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Kenneth Forbus
It might only be a extra hundred rpms but you constantly running that over the coarse of your vehicles life. The 3.55 will see around 19-20 mpg and 3.73 will get 17 mpg. 2 mpg extra gives you 50 more miles per tank. For me that's over 1000 extra miles per year. Anyway good luck with your choice!
I've compared my mileage to several posts of FX4 owners with 5.4L, 3.73 axle, and 6R80 (2009/2010) and they are consistantly 1.5 to 2.0 mpg worse than my mileage. I've also seen others with the 3.55 axle, 5.4L, and 6R80 and their mileage seems to mirror mine.
Old 11-12-2011, 07:48 PM
  #28  
Senior Member
 
Mike Up's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 3,067
Received 531 Likes on 395 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 69428SCJ
My sides are killing me from the laughter. Where is your proof on this?? I can lower my RPM's by a couple of hundred and reduce my aero drag by 15-20% by simply slowing from 72 to 65 and only pick up .5mpg. That is a way bigger change than a 3.73 to 3.55 gear change. A 5% gear change up or down will never equate to 2-3 mpg in these trucks. NO WAY...EVER! You sound like one of those diesel drivers who say they get 25 mpg.

My truck routinely gets 20 mpg all day long on the freeway with the 3.73's. The only time it has even been close to 17 was running into a 30mph headwind when it was around 18. Same wind coming back it was almost 24. I've driven both trucks and the mileage was within a few tenths.
Doing research on this forum and others will tell the story. There is a significant gain in mpg with the 3.55. No need to be a jerk about it. Just research. If there were no difference, Ford simply wouldn't offer it. It's for mileage.

Last edited by Mike Up; 11-12-2011 at 07:51 PM.
Old 11-12-2011, 08:03 PM
  #29  
Nathan
 
nathan_nathaniel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Edmonton, Canada
Posts: 662
Received 22 Likes on 16 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Mike Up

Doing research on this forum and others will tell the story. There is a significant gain in mpg with the 3.55. No need to be a jerk about it. Just research. If there were no difference, Ford simply wouldn't offer it. It's for mileage.
Of course it's for mileage, but *OTHER* factors besides gearing will make a *FAR* bigger difference over time than this very minor difference due to gearing. For example, we have different guys in this forum claiming wildly different mpg despite the fact that they are driving the same truck with the same gears.
Old 11-12-2011, 08:08 PM
  #30  
Senior Member
 
69428SCJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: North Texas
Posts: 647
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Mike Up
Doing research on this forum and others will tell the story. There is a significant gain in mpg with the 3.55. No need to be a jerk about it. Just research. If there were no difference, Ford simply wouldn't offer it. It's for mileage.
There are plenty of Ecoboost... not 5.4 owners with 3.73's that get the same mileage as the Ecoboost with the 3.55's. I'm not comparing anything with a 5.4 in it....total different motor. What does significant mean to you. I employ 33 techs driving an array of different vehicles putting 40-60K on them every year. 4 are Ecoboost trucks. All are 4 wheel drives SCREWS. Mine is the only longbed. Three are 3.73's and one is a 3.55. His mileage is no better. I actually get better mileage than most people here report regardless of gears. Texas is flat. I routinely see 20 mpg average tanks. They are usually 420 straight highway and around 100 of mixed rural/city. The 3.55 to 3.73 difference is not big enough to warrant a big increase. There is absolutely no way it is 2-3 mpg.


Quick Reply: 3.55 or 3.73 with ecoboost



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:19 PM.