Topic Sponsor
2009 - 2014 Ford F150 General discussion on 2009 - 2014 Ford F150 truck.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

12.9 mpg city

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-22-2014, 12:41 PM
  #51  
Senior Member
 
zacharyz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Cali
Posts: 659
Received 51 Likes on 36 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by BStrummin
6500 miles, 12.6 average. It gets driven ~25 miles each day in stop and go traffic which drives the mpg waaaay down. The rare times I get on the freeway though it's pretty easy to keep it in the 20-25 range. Also the average tends to tick down 0.1 everytime I pull my 6,000 lb rv somewhere, and it's probably pulling 10-11 during those trips. It's not all that much different from other engines/trucks from what I gather, so not a huge deal, but disappointing.

I agree with the poster - it's not about a truck that gets fantastic (and unreasonable) mpg, it's about the truck getting at least close to what was advertised. We ended up getting a decent sized check from Ford over the deceptive mpg advertising with our fusion hybrid.
What was your actual mileage on the fusion? I heard about that.
Old 10-22-2014, 01:24 PM
  #52  
Senior Member
 
2ndchance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Dallas/Ft. Worth
Posts: 220
Received 22 Likes on 20 Posts

Default

I agree with the OP he should be seeing better mileage. I'm sure the tires do have some effect but there's nothing wrong with buying the 3.7 v6 and expecting better results. This is 2014, we should all expect to get a little better mpg's from them.
Old 10-22-2014, 01:39 PM
  #53  
Senior Member
 
130428's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 2,923
Received 708 Likes on 486 Posts
Default

if you look at the lie-o-meter in city driving, I'm almost certain the truck does better mileage-wise if you start a little hard at the lights, get up to speed (50-60 km/h) quickly, and then just coast, rather than accelerating slowly to get there. (I'm not talking hitting redline everytime either!)
that might not work if you have a red light at every block, but if you can drive 4-5 blocks without stopping, it should do better.

Also like I always say, some members here live in a 5,000-or-less people cities, with 3 traffic lights and 2 stop signs. Others live downtown in 1M+ cities. Both drivers will call it city driving, but one is obviously much harder on mileage than the other...

just my $ 0.02 on this lovely fall morning!
Old 10-22-2014, 01:45 PM
  #54  
Snow Engineer
 
GetYaFordOn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Kingston, Ontario
Posts: 374
Received 53 Likes on 29 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ecopat
I'm almost certain the truck does better mileage-wise if you start a little hard at the lights, get up to speed (50-60 km/h) quickly, and then just coast, rather than accelerating slowly to get there. (I'm not talking hitting redline everytime either!)!
Can't decide whether Trolling or just a Physics 101 failure?
Old 10-22-2014, 05:08 PM
  #55  
Senior Member
 
130428's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 2,923
Received 708 Likes on 486 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by GetYaFordOn
Can't decide whether Trolling or just a Physics 101 failure?
no trolling actually, just experience (although not scientifically measured).

Maybe I should have qualified my statement. I'm not talking about pedal-to-the-floor / burnout style take-offs, just a little more aggressive than the average 24-y-o girl stuck on her Twitter account at the lights, or Granpa & Granma on a Sunday cruise.

Instead of being light on the throttle for 1/2 mile, trying to get your 6,000-lb brick to move, you get up to speed "quickly" (say, 1 block in the city, 3-3.5k rpms shifts), and then coast to the next light. Again, that wont work if you hit a red light at every intersection...

Smarter people than me have written on that too.

Last edited by 130428; 10-22-2014 at 05:12 PM.
Old 10-22-2014, 05:23 PM
  #56  
Senior Member
 
BStrummin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: NorCal
Posts: 453
Received 145 Likes on 90 Posts

Default

Our Fusion hyb. is sitting at around 37 mpg (mostly freeway). I think the advertised sticker was 43?

The jackrabbit start and then maintain is something that definitely works in the hybrids - use the low mpg engine to boost and then battery to maintain, but I don't think that's true for conventional power systems.
Old 10-22-2014, 09:12 PM
  #57  
Senior Member
 
2ndchance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Dallas/Ft. Worth
Posts: 220
Received 22 Likes on 20 Posts

Default

I've read about it in some threads on here and it does seem to work. As I watch the lie-ometer when I drive down the highway, I wonder if overpasses should be designed differently. Would a shorter uphill approaching the overpass and a longer downhill after the overpass help fuel economy? Maybe someone on here can say if that adds up scientifically?
Old 10-23-2014, 08:46 AM
  #58  
Snow Engineer
 
GetYaFordOn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Kingston, Ontario
Posts: 374
Received 53 Likes on 29 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ecopat
Instead of being light on the throttle for 1/2 mile, trying to get your 6,000-lb brick to move, you get up to speed "quickly" (say, 1 block in the city, 3-3.5k rpms shifts), and then coast to the next light. Again, that wont work if you hit a red light at every intersection...

Smarter people than me have written on that too.
Yeah, I too, have seen others with that opinion. However, here's the straight dope from Natural Resources Canada website. (Scientists are generally smarter than anyone)

http://www.nrcan.gc.ca/energy/effici...echniques/7509

Last edited by GetYaFordOn; 10-23-2014 at 08:52 AM.
Old 10-23-2014, 09:49 AM
  #59  
Senior Member
 
mksmth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 135
Received 23 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

my experience so far with my 11 Scab 2wd 3.7 39kmiles is about 16.7 on the meter over the last 1000 miles. My daily commute is about 15 miles of mile to mile stop and go at a bout 40-50 MPH. then about 20 miles of highway at about 60-70. I was really hoping to see 17+. and I am driving with MPG in mind. Maybe Ill just give it gas and let it breath for a tank and see what happens. with the winter blend of fuel coming in a month or so I expect Ill dip down into the 15's. For sure a bit disappointed.
Anyone have any luck cleaning the mass air sensor and getting better MPG. I read a few have.
Old 10-23-2014, 10:04 AM
  #60  
Junior Member
 
nvr2low's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 28
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

2012 SCREW 4x2 3.7L completely stock 33,000 miles. I commute 30 miles each way to work on the highway, cruise set to about 67. then a few miles a day around country roads and a small village. I track every fill up on my phone and my overall average for 6,200 miles is 20.57 mpg. my lowest MPG for a tank was 17.85 when I was off from work for a week and only drove around town, no highway driving. I try to drive for decent millage, RPMs below 2000, I dont get into the pedal unless I have to and it works out well. driving habits play a big part in mpg, I see my millage drop 2 mpg when someone else drives the truck and doesn't pay attention.


Quick Reply: 12.9 mpg city



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:24 AM.