Topic Sponsor
Wheels & Tires Let's talk Wheels & Tires here!

Going from 35"s AT to 32"s Touring

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-30-2015, 12:06 PM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
redcelica's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 179
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts

Default Going from 35"s AT to 32"s Touring

Just bought a 2012 F150 (front leveled) yesterday with the 3.5L and got 14.7mpg highway with cruise on going home. Safe to say, I'm blaming the 35" BFG A/Ts. Wondering if going with something more stock size and a on-road use tire will net me a lot better MPG. 17+ would be worth the investment to me.

Didn't buy the truck for looks or "compensation," so I don't mind going back to a 275/55/20 or so

http://www.tirerack.com/tires/tires....LX20&tab=Sizes

I use the truck for short trips to lowe's, hauling, and towing. Light snow use (I live in NC) w/ 4 wheel drive. I think a smaller tire will help with applied torque when towing as well. I'll be towing about 5000 lbs...so those should be okay for the max load rating.

Last edited by redcelica; 09-30-2015 at 12:20 PM.
Old 09-30-2015, 12:17 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
130428's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 2,923
Received 708 Likes on 486 Posts
Default

the lighter / less aggressive tire will likely make a difference. a 2.3 mpg difference, that no one can tell for sure...

before anyone else mentions it, have you checked your speedo / mileage to see if it's accurate (= accurate mpg reading), or did you hand-calculate? That could (or not) mean that you are getting slightly better than you think.
Old 09-30-2015, 12:20 PM
  #3  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
redcelica's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 179
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ecopat
the lighter / less aggressive tire will likely make a difference. a 2.3 mpg difference, that no one can tell for sure...

before anyone else mentions it, have you checked your speedo / mileage to see if it's accurate (= accurate mpg reading), or did you hand-calculate? That could (or not) mean that you are getting slightly better than you think.
Just filled up the tank for the first time, so I'll calculate on next fill up. So the MPG calculation done by the computer is in fact dependent on the tire revs per mile that some sensor is detecting?
Old 10-01-2015, 01:32 PM
  #4  
Official Bass Slapper
 
Jeriko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Posts: 258
Received 28 Likes on 28 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by redcelica
Just filled up the tank for the first time, so I'll calculate on next fill up. So the MPG calculation done by the computer is in fact dependent on the tire revs per mile that some sensor is detecting?
exactly. if the computer isn't calibrated for the size of tire (specifically, rotations per mile), it will record that you're not going as far as you actually are going if it's still programmed for stock. So less distance recorded and same fuel used will result in higher apparent consumption.
The following users liked this post:
130428 (10-01-2015)



Quick Reply: Going from 35"s AT to 32"s Touring



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:52 PM.