Ecoboost vs 5.0
#11
Senior Member
Summarizing all the research I did before purchasing mine:
1) If you will be towing / hauling a lot the ECO is a better choices, the power is available much earlier in the RPM range.
2) They get very similar MPGs, with the ECO getting the slight advantage.
3) More traditional truck sound with the 5.0
Personally, I chose the 5.0. I am not going to do that much towing / hauling and the 'premium' price with the ECO just didn't make sense for me.
They are both great trucks, like anything, each have advantages and disadvantages.
1) If you will be towing / hauling a lot the ECO is a better choices, the power is available much earlier in the RPM range.
2) They get very similar MPGs, with the ECO getting the slight advantage.
3) More traditional truck sound with the 5.0
Personally, I chose the 5.0. I am not going to do that much towing / hauling and the 'premium' price with the ECO just didn't make sense for me.
They are both great trucks, like anything, each have advantages and disadvantages.
#12
I think that really it's personal preferance. Both engines get the job done, but with the timing chain issues and some of the others, I think 5.0 may be a little bit safer. I love my 5.0 and have an eco in a lincoln mkt which is starting the noise on start up thing at 66k miles. I really like the eco too, but think if it's a severe duty application I might choose the 5.0 just due to it being less complex. That is just my opinion though so take it for what it's worth which ain't much lol.
#13
Senior Member
I'm not sure the 5.0 is that much less complex. And some 5.0's have knocking issues.
#15
I didnt trust the ecoboost. And being I go out hunting a lot. I didnt want an unreliable engine and I trust the v8 5.0 more so.
#16
Yep some 5.0s knock as do some 5.4s, 4.6 3vs and every other vvt engine from various mfgs. That said they still seem less problematic than ecos (I love my eco in the lincoln mkt but it's starting to make noise at start up now. Thank God its under warranty to 100k) which also have vvt and turbo/cac and cooling issues while towing. I have yet to hear of a 5.0 overheat issue while towing, while a cottage industry has sprung up around cooling ecos. The 5.0 holds two extra quarts of oil has external oil cooling and cooling jets on the pistons, it's complex as any modern engine but less than an eco and built tough to work hard and stay cool doing it.
#17
Senior Member
Sigh
It's like the ground hog day movie with these threads
It's like the ground hog day movie with these threads
The following 2 users liked this post by GriffFX4:
acadianbob (10-26-2014),
sgtpatiolantern (10-23-2014)
#18
Senior Member
I don't think either one has a measurable advantage over the other for "normal" F150 owners. They both work excellent for normal chores like hauling the boat, etc. I chose the V8 because: I LOVE the sound, it has more than enough power for my needs, and I am of that age group that believes pickup trucks must have 8 cylinders and no turbos. This is my opinion- nothing more.
The following users liked this post:
depami (10-17-2014)
#20
Senior Member
I don't think either one has a measurable advantage over the other for "normal" F150 owners. They both work excellent for normal chores like hauling the boat, etc. I chose the V8 because: I LOVE the sound, it has more than enough power for my needs, and I am of that age group that believes pickup trucks must have 8 cylinders and no turbos. This is my opinion- nothing more.
Eco has gobs more torque and with a simple tune ridiculous power (and yes having a tune is somewhat common).
5. 0 is measurably cheaper.
I agree they both work, but one IS "measurably" better.
If you and I had the same boat behind us, an Eco would pull that boat up to hwy speed with far more ease and pull a hill the same. That's enjoyable for a "normal" owner.
My opinion as well. Funny how every manufacturer has this. Folks who don't buy the better engine and then explain why.... Mustang boards, camaro boards, truck boards.