Topic Sponsor
General F150 Discussion General Ford F150 truck discussions and questions
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

5.0 owners advice

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-08-2016, 09:41 AM
  #11  
Senior Member
 
JLTD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 667
Received 83 Likes on 74 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 5x56
I am in the market for my first truck and I have decided on Ford and I have decided on the 5.0. My question is for anyone who actually owns a 5.0.
Welcome to Ford!


Originally Posted by 5x56
1. What are the real world MPG you're getting
2. If you could do it again would you get the EB?
3. Are the rattle issues with the 5.0 more common in specific years (what to avoid)
1) This oil change (8000 miles) is averaging about 18.7(edited: checked today to be sure), with a lot of highway miles at 70+mph. I have seen as high as 23.2mpg on a long trip at 60mph, and as low as 13.1 mpg at 80mph against a strong wind. Average around 17 around town if you keep your foot out of it. These figures are all by the vehicle's mpg calculator, I've hand calculated and it's very close.

2) Nope. If I lived in high mountains and towed a lot, the turbos would be useful; but neither applies and I prefer the linear power delivery of a NA engine. The 3.5EB does produce gobs of power, but it comes in a huge surge (part of the appeal I'm sure).

3) This problem was (I think) solved by early 2013; I have not had any issue with mine at almost 50k miles.

Originally Posted by 5x56
I am afraid of long term issues with the EB and really just love the sound and idea of a v8 thats always on (unlike Chevy and Ram with cyl deactivation) I have noticed there isn't much talk about the new 5.0 with the extra power for 2015+ and wondered if there were any other changes and or if the extra boost in power was really noticeable compared to the older 5.0
Long term durability was my concern also, when I was shopping for mine the problems with the '11 EBs were getting a lot of attention here. Cylinder deactivation is for CAFE and only adds complication, not reliability IMO. Haven't driven the '15 and up version so can't comment on the change to the 5.0.


edit: Oh and I'm using 5w30 in mine, have observed no drop in mpg.

Last edited by JLTD; 06-08-2016 at 11:33 PM.
Old 06-08-2016, 10:38 AM
  #12  
Senior Member
 
redranger04g's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 1,357
Received 325 Likes on 240 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 5x56
1. What are the real world MPG your getting
2. If you could do it again would you get the EB?
3. Are the rattle issues with the 5.0 more common in specific years (what to avoid)
1. Between 18-19 city, 21-22 highway. I have 3.31 gears.
2. No, BUT if I was towing close to max capacities frequently I would get the EB. But my truck just pulls a 6000 lb boat 4-5 times a year. My dad has an EB and constantly asks me why I get more MPG than him. He has an aggressive driving style and drives fast, and I keep trying to explain to him it is either ECO or BOOST, not both.
3. Not sure, I have a 2015, no problems with mine.
Old 06-08-2016, 11:04 AM
  #13  
2WD
Junior Member
 
2WD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

2013 5.0 3.55 axle Crew Cab 2WD, 35k miles
Lifetime avg. 18.4 mpg

16-17 city, 22 highway

If you tow a lot you should get the EB. Occasional towing or towing light loads frequently the 5.0 is good. The Fast Lane Truck did a nice video of the 5.0 doing the Ike Gauntlet with 9k lb trailer if you want to search for that.
Old 06-08-2016, 11:36 AM
  #14  
_
 
Ledbetter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: PA
Posts: 21
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I have a 2013 5.0 4x4 crew cab 6.5' bed.

I drive fairly reserved...
Combined city/hwy is around 17. Highway around 23.


I'm happy with the 5.0 & would buy one again.
Old 06-08-2016, 07:10 PM
  #15  
Senior Member
 
marks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: N.H.
Posts: 131
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts

Default

I have a 2012 4X4 8200GVW extra cab with 3:73 gears. I am not on the highway much and I average 18.5 mpg. I have a little over 70k and have no rattles.
Old 06-08-2016, 08:13 PM
  #16  
Senior Member
 
marshallr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Georgia
Posts: 3,223
Likes: 0
Received 1,287 Likes on 903 Posts
Default

I bought a lightly used, (17,000 miles) 2014 two weeks ago. It is a 4X4 Supercrew XLT with the 5.0. I looked around for about 2 months and spent countless hours doing internet searches for used 2012-2014 trucks in my area.

For me it was truly a toss-up. I drove examples of both and couldn't tell a bit of difference. The 3.5 turbo WILL tow more if properly equipped. But in 2 months of looking I never ran across a used 3.5 set up to tow significantly more than the 5.0. Every single used 3.5 I looked at had 3.31 gears. Every single 5.0 had 3.55 gears. The difference in towing capacity on the ones I looked at just wasn't that much. The 5.0 in mine is rated to tow more than I'll ever tow.

The tipping point for me was price. I found that I could get the 5.0 about $1500-$2000 less than the 3.5 in comparable used trucks. I passed on a 2013 nearly identical to the one I bought with 27,000 miles. Price was exactly the same. Had the price been the same, or if I towed a lot heavier trailers I'd have probably bought 3.5.

I've put over 1,000 miles on it in 2 weeks and have never let the 36 gal tank get much below 1/2 tank. The on dash computations have been within .1 mpg of my hand calculations on 3 fill-ups so I'll consider it accurate.

I don't do any real city driving, mostly rural 2 lanes or small town. I'm getting 17 mpg there. I used the on dash calculations for one 60+ mile interstate section with cruise control on 70 mph and got 20.5mpg. The overall average has been close to 19.
Old 06-08-2016, 08:18 PM
  #17  
Junior Member
 
Greg Fields's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

#1- 18.7 all around.. 4700 on clock now.
#2- I'd only get the 5.0
#3- no problems so far......
Old 06-08-2016, 08:39 PM
  #18  
Senior Member
 
elfiero's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 653
Received 103 Likes on 82 Posts

Default

'13 FX4
15.1 mpg avg over 13,000 miles.
Didn't ever consider the Ecoboost.
Nothing beats the sound and the power surge of the coyote.
Old 06-08-2016, 09:13 PM
  #19  
Junior Member
 
bordercollie 3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 10
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Have a 2012 64k no problems whatsoever here in flat de get 17 to 20 mpg. Last trip to South Hill Va got 29.9 round trip according to trucks fuel mileage. Trip a little less than 600 miles mostly flat and mid grade gas. Seems to run better for me. Everything stock origins tires Heard to many problems with ECOB. Np complaints.
Old 06-08-2016, 09:15 PM
  #20  
Junior Member
 
bordercollie 3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 10
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

[QUOTE="bordercollie 3;4779256"]Have a 2012 64k no problems whatsoever here in flat de get 17 to 20 mpg. Last trip to South Hill Va got 29.9 round trip according to trucks fuel mileage. Trip a little less than 600 miles mostly flat and mid grade gas. Seems to run better for me. Everything stock origins tires Heard to many problems with ECOB. No complaints. 4/4


Quick Reply: 5.0 owners advice



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:31 PM.