Topic Sponsor
Super Duty Forum Talk about Super Duty and Heavy Duty Ford trucks here.

Got an F250

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-23-2011, 02:12 AM
  #11  
Junior Member
 
Gulfcoast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

nice
Old 07-23-2011, 02:41 AM
  #12  
Senior Member
 
blueovelboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: bay area
Posts: 2,015
Received 70 Likes on 64 Posts

Default

sweet ride!
Old 07-26-2011, 11:33 AM
  #13  
Junior Member
 
03svtsnakevert's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

awesome looking set up!!
Old 08-03-2011, 09:37 PM
  #14  
Hydro Commando
Thread Starter
 
boomsling's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Abilene, Tx
Posts: 132
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Thanks fellas!

The 6.2 pulls the camper well. I can maintain speed on the hills, but the motor really has to rev to do it. It's made to rev, so I'm not too worried. On the way home from a camping trip, I wasn't paying attention to the speedometer and just flowing with traffic. I looked down and I was going 85mph! Way too fast for a camper! With the camper, at 65mph on the flats, I get as low as 11 and as high as 15mpg depending on the wind. When it's hilly, 7.5-9 mpg. Unloaded around town I average 9-12 and I get 16-17 on the highway. All of these according to the lie-o-meter in the dash.

The 6.2 is definitely not a diesel, but the power is acceptable. The 6 speed is awesome! The chassis is strong, so I feel safe and stable while towing. The only thing I wish my truck had, is cab clearance lights. I might get some in the future, when I get my train horns.


We've been camping at least once a month lately, sometimes two times a month. It's been hot as hell lately down here, so we probably won't camp again until the end of September.

Last edited by boomsling; 08-03-2011 at 11:58 PM. Reason: spellin
Old 08-04-2011, 01:45 AM
  #15  
resident post whore
 
2000fordf1504x4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Montrose SD
Posts: 102,624
Received 62 Likes on 62 Posts

Default

Sounds like a good and honest consumer report
Old 09-30-2011, 12:29 AM
  #16  
hoonigan
 
damasta227's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Edmonton Alberta Canada
Posts: 130
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

lookin good but in a year or two you'll be kicking your self for not buying the diesel that what my dad did after he bought his 2000 f250 v10 now he runs a 2008 f350 powerstroke
Old 10-01-2011, 12:25 PM
  #17  
Senior Member
 
bcangelo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 452
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

I will say the mileage is not far off of what my 11 6.7 did. I only got 15 on the hiway empty and around 12 in town. The 6.7 is an 8k upgrade, I never ever thought I would consider a 250 with a gasser but after having the 6.7 mpg with epa crap and maintance costs,the gasser is not a bad option.
Old 10-01-2011, 12:34 PM
  #18  
GIGGITY
 
Wondertwin1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: FLORIDA
Posts: 12,055
Likes: 0
Received 23 Likes on 23 Posts
Default

^this.

Ive been seeing more and more gassers lately. And honestly, its a great deal. The old V10's with flowmasters sounded uhhhhmaaaaaaaziiiiiing
Old 10-21-2011, 02:59 PM
  #19  
Member
 
loughman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Very nice truck. We have a 2011 F250 at work with the 6.2 and pull a cargo trailer weighing about 10K and it does fine. I think the cost of the diesels, plus complexity of urea injection, dpf, etc makes them financially unattractive. I would bet that for most buyers of the F250/F350 the 6.2 actually is the financially wiser choice for the life cycle assuming it gives the towing capacity needed.

I know Dodge used to advertise that something like 80% of the 3/4 and 1 ton pickup buyers bought the Cummins, and in my area the % seems to be the same for Ford, but I suspect that is going to shift slightly away from the diesels favor as people realize the up front $8k plus ongoing maintenance and fuel cost (more $$ per gallon for diesel in the northeast, and the diesels advantage in mpg has shrunk as more emissions crap has been added). In my view the diesels continually improved, but now are headed downhill, whereas the gas engines have improved and the gap between the diesels and gas engines have been closed.

If I had to replace my 2005 Dodge 3500 w/ Cummins, i would probably by a F350 with the 6.2....I think I have bought my last new diesel......

Good luck with the truck
Old 10-21-2011, 05:58 PM
  #20  
Member
 
macoyle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: League City, TX
Posts: 50
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

I wish I had a 6.7 lol


Quick Reply: Got an F250



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:35 PM.