Go Back   Ford F150 Forum - Community of Ford Truck Fans > Late Model F150s > Super Duty Forum
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?


Reply
 
 
 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 08-23-2012, 09:56 PM   #81
Senior Member
 
05 4x4 Triton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Georgia
Posts: 1,622
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by geabis View Post
The article is at least credible. Not a Internet blogger posting non-sence about a deceased block that ulsd has buried long ago. But I do miss the 7.3. It was the last bullet proof ford diesel. Rip.

In 2006 gm introduced the lbz. It boasted more power than the competition and less maintenance costs backed by a 6spd auto. And I believe this was the start of the pickup diesel race. This was also a year that ram increased diesel availability bc of the demand. and I believe ford has been playing catchup untill the introduction of another ford built block with 6.7 and the 6 spd auto in 2011. Ram has and probably always will stand tall on the cummins. But their chassis lack the heavy duty appeal that ford and gm has. I mean their crew can dually boasts 2500# of payload. Come on! ford and gm has over 4k on a single rear wheel.

And the article is very selective in not including gmc. As gmc has a more extensive truck line than Chevy. So by playing with the wording it is secretly misleading.
That's exactly what I thought haha. I agree with you about the LBZ, it is probably chevy's best diesel engine. However, I'm not sure where you get that about the payload of the dodge because according to their website a crew cab 3500 can haul like 4400lbs or something. They claim the outdoorsman 2500 can haul like 4400 but i wouldn't ever do it on a srw ha

Last edited by 05 4x4 Triton; 08-23-2012 at 10:03 PM.
05 4x4 Triton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2012, 10:23 PM   #82
Senior Member
 
geabis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 655
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 9 Times in 8 Posts
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Default

I'm in the market for a new hd (trading my limited f150) have to use my personal vehicle to cover for everytime the company 450 is in the shop ( never seen a bigger pos than the 6.4) and have been looking at the longhorn megacab 3500 and it's like 2500# with 3:73's and the cummins 4x4 , on their payload towing calculator. I can get out to 17000# towing by going with 4:10's. But don't think it changes the payload. Now their commercial line boasts more payload but it's a chassis cab.
geabis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2012, 10:29 PM   #83
Senior Member
 
geabis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 655
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 9 Times in 8 Posts
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Default

You are correct. I was looking at the shortbed. It's the only option available with the megacab. So that pretty much leaves me less choices.
geabis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2012, 10:46 PM   #84
Senior Member
 
geabis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 655
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 9 Times in 8 Posts
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Default

Still falls short on towing and payload compared to ford and with the crew in the ram , rear seat leg room is less than the ford it's about equal in the megacab.
geabis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2012, 11:06 PM   #85
Senior Member
 
SteelCity USW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 229
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by geabis
You are correct. I was looking at the shortbed. It's the only option available with the megacab. So that pretty much leaves me less choices.
Sharp truck man. I hope they give you proper money for that bad *** limited. But I'm sure that Ram won't disappoint. Gotta post some pics when you pick it up.
__________________
2012 F-150 FX4 SCREW. MAX TOW LUXURY PACKAGE
2006 F-350 FX4 SCREW King Ranch 6.0L 170,000 miles
-Leveled w/ Cepek 35 AT's & 20x9 DC TORQUE wheels.
-SCT w/ Custom tunes -6 inch duel aussie stacks
1997 F-350 SC 8' bed 280,000+ miles - old reliable
SteelCity USW is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2012, 11:45 PM   #86
Senior Member
 
geabis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 655
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 9 Times in 8 Posts
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SteelCity USW

Sharp truck man. I hope they give you proper money for that bad *** limited. But I'm sure that Ram won't disappoint. Gotta post some pics when you pick it up.
Thanks. I'll post up whatever I get. Probably not till dec or jan. after my company's bonuses are distributed.
geabis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-29-2012, 04:33 PM   #87
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 226
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Default

I'm depressed that I have to buy a freakin' Dodge if I ever want to feel a manual transmission pulling 800+ lb feet in a big truck.

Several working class people I know that drove my friends manual cummins made serious financial sacrifices to get one of their own. It's such a fun experience for a truck dork.

I read forums like this and everyone wishes Ford made a super duty with a manual. Am I over-estimating the amount of people who want one? It seems like everyone does.
andrew72 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-29-2012, 05:06 PM   #88
Senior Member
 
geabis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 655
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 9 Times in 8 Posts
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by andrew72
I'm depressed that I have to buy a freakin' Dodge if I ever want to feel a manual transmission pulling 800+ lb feet in a big truck.

Several working class people I know that drove my friends manual cummins made serious financial sacrifices to get one of their own. It's such a fun experience for a truck dork.

I read forums like this and everyone wishes Ford made a super duty with a manual. Am I over-estimating the amount of people who want one? It seems like everyone does.
The manual trans model only has 600 ft/ lbs of torque.
geabis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-2012, 03:37 PM   #89
not hypnotized
 
nfldfordman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: New Harbour, NFLD
Posts: 34,941
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Thanked 332 Times in 318 Posts
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by speeddemon86 View Post
Guy I know had a 6.4 powerstroke and traded it for a 6.7 dodge. Says the dodge is way easier on fuel which was his biggest complaint on the pstroke. Said plowing with the powerstroke he only got like 180km on a full tank of fuel and like 450km driving normally. Says he gets almost 700 with the cummins. This isnt personal experience just what I've been told. And another buddy of mine had quite a few problems with his powerstroke. I don't really know top many people with either motor especially the cummins so I haven't heard much about it.
the new 6.7 powerstroke is supposed to be much more fuel efficient .
nfldfordman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-2012, 03:39 PM   #90
not hypnotized
 
nfldfordman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: New Harbour, NFLD
Posts: 34,941
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Thanked 332 Times in 318 Posts
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Default

I hear the cummins is a good engine for sure,
BUT F-250 all the way!
-Zach
nfldfordman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-2012, 03:39 PM
 
 
 
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Join F150 Forum

 

The Mustang Source
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:20 AM.


Copyright 2006 - 20011 F150forum.com
This site is in no way affiliated with the Ford Motor Company.