volvodoc

Here is my comparison on the 5.0 vers 2.7. Both units the same except engines. Both pulling same load over same route, La Vita and Raton pass. 2.7 did it much easier. Watching the Ultra Gauge (turbo folks need this) instant mpg fell to middle single numbers with boost way up. For the whole trip the 5.0 averaged 4 mpg more than the 2.7.

2.7Ecoboost

So it sounds like the 2.7l pulled easier at elevation but got its but kicked in MPG's compared to the 5.0 which did not pull as easily. I guess if pulling is going to tow a lot maybe the 5.0 is the way to go. I don't tow that often so the 2.7l will probably pay off for me.

Rabbit

That's about what I was thinking. Trailer is 1800 to 2000 if I remember right.

Titaniumone

This is the time of the year that I bring back the boat to the city for the winter (It is also the first time towing with this truck. I now have 2400 km or 1490 miles). The trek is a 240 km (150 miles) each way. It's 50% divided highway, 25 % single lane highway, 5 % town roads and 20% gravel / logging roads that are not always in the best of shapes. It's in the mountains so up and down hills and mountains is the norm. The trailer/boat combo is 4900 lbs.

The trek up was normal. 2 passengers, the dog and some food and our bags in the cab and a large cooler, beer, 4 x 5 gals of gas some tools and a full propane BBQ tank in the bed. I averaged 11.8L / 100 kms (20 MPG).

The trek back was different. No issue pulling on pavement. I would say it equals the V8 or diesel of any brand SUV or pick-up averaging 14.5L/100 km or 16 MPG. For the gravel - logging road however, I averaged 28.9L/100 km or 8 MPG @ about 20-25 KPH or 12-15 MPH. The road was bad enough that I couldn't gather enough steam to climb up the next hill so I had to lean into the accelerator going up. This is where I notice how this rig really goes about pulling.

There is no real difference in power or torque than a V8. I would even venture and say that there seems to be more juice under my right foot at any given time and that I didn't need to dip in too far either to access the torque. The difference is how that power is delivered. For one, it's more immediate. When the turbo kicks in, it kicks in and you feel it. It's strong enough that at times, I thought the transmission had downshifted. I need to get used to that. They are different and don't last the same amount of time. It is not as seamless as a big V8. Number 2 is the noise. I also need to get used to this one. High energy power like this is noisy and feels unnatural.

The bottom line is this. The 2.7L EcoBoost is a power beast. There's more power, comes on quicker but noisier that a V8. The Tow/Haul mode works very well. It keeps the transmission in check and provides awesome engine/transmission compression. While you mileage may vary, my test is conclusive, it's less thirsty at the pump while doing it.

I am extremely happy with my choice.

Nighthawk87

Looking at a 6000 dry 7500 wet TT for my 2016 Lariat 2.7. I have the payload package with a payload of 1716.

Originally I was looking at a 6500 wet TT but we really like the 7700 wet TT. My tow rating 8200 pounds.

Thoughts?

Nighthawk87

...

Titaniumone

I'd say you're good to go!

Velosprout

7700 wet equals 924 tongue weight, add 80 pounds WDH weight, and you are up to 1000 pounds of payload used, leaving you only 716.


Add four persons in the truck at 200 pounds each, 50 pounds of firewood, 75 lb tonneau cover, 50 lb bedliner, tools, firearms, purses, cooler, bicycles, toys, etc., and you are well over payload.

RobertP

Just for your info the 5.4 was a beast maybe not the fastest but it would handle a heavy load all day everyday when towing u aren't trying to win a race the 2.7 is not power limited I'd say it's because of high boost levels for a prolonged period

Rexey

yup my slow assed 5.4 pulls all day long... As good as new. 180k