Topic Sponsor
2015 - 2020 Ford F150 General discussion on the 13th generation Ford F150 truck.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Help me pick a new Axle Ratio

Old 07-01-2014, 03:54 PM
  #1  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
putt4doe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default Help me pick a new Axle Ratio

I'm trying to figure out what axle ratio I should get on my new F-150 (might get the 250 - still deciding)

Either way, I'm curious... I currently have a 3.55 non-limited slip axle, however, sometimes it binds in 4x4 (as they all do)... If I went with the 3.55 electronically locking axle ratio, would it reduce the binding when in 4x4?

What's the major difference, and why should I get one over the other? What are the pros/cons?

Thanks!
Old 07-01-2014, 06:56 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
iFord's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Missouri Ozarks & Clay Country GA
Posts: 1,545
Received 162 Likes on 134 Posts

Default

Good answers coming soon, unfortunately, no good ones from me. I don't so much. Mine is also 3:55 limited slip or some such. They'll be asking about towing, etc., but you already know about all that.

Okay boys, chime in, help old putt!
Old 07-01-2014, 08:13 PM
  #3  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Fx4_5.0Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Winchester, Va
Posts: 461
Received 40 Likes on 38 Posts

Default

Gear ratio should not matter or make a difference in the binding situation.
Old 07-01-2014, 08:14 PM
  #4  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Fx4_5.0Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Winchester, Va
Posts: 461
Received 40 Likes on 38 Posts

Default

I vote at least 3.73 in everything I own.
The following users liked this post:
justjimmy (07-01-2014)
Old 07-01-2014, 11:55 PM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
StonedGreen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Montreal
Posts: 584
Received 67 Likes on 51 Posts

Default

yeah the 3.55's are a little slouchy as I have them also. the 3.73s make the truck feel some much lighter and zippy. If I could, I'd go 4.10 as it would make acceleration so much quicker, but the fuel consumption would be killer
The following users liked this post:
cosway (07-11-2014)
Old 07-02-2014, 10:25 AM
  #6  
Junior Member
 
RandyZie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 9
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

What's the hit on fuel economy 3.55 vs 3.73
Old 07-02-2014, 11:21 AM
  #7  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
putt4doe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Is there a difference in the binding between an electronic limited slip vs. a non-limited slip axle?
Old 07-04-2014, 05:38 PM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
rancheroracer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Ca.
Posts: 271
Received 41 Likes on 30 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by putt4doe
Is there a difference in the binding between an electronic limited slip vs. a non-limited slip axle?
I wouldn't think so, the binding is caused by the different radius the front takes vs the rear, not the limit slip or not.

Also, considering 3.73 vs 3.55 for acceleration, my '12 with 3.55s ran the same 1/4 mile ETs as my '11 with 3.73s stock. These trannies have such a low 1st gear that my '12 still launches very hard & it doesn't seem to hurt the acceleration down the track either. I'm even considering 3.31s when I order a '15 if they're still available.
Old 07-04-2014, 10:26 PM
  #9  
Senior Member
 
Curmudgeon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Pacific NW
Posts: 1,360
Received 333 Likes on 214 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by rancheroracer
I wouldn't think so, the binding is caused by the different radius the front takes vs the rear, not the limit slip or not.

Also, considering 3.73 vs 3.55 for acceleration, my '12 with 3.55s ran the same 1/4 mile ETs as my '11 with 3.73s stock. These trannies have such a low 1st gear that my '12 still launches very hard & it doesn't seem to hurt the acceleration down the track either. I'm even considering 3.31s when I order a '15 if they're still available.

3.31 will be available with all engines except the NA 3.5; 3.15 will be available only with the 3.5 EB.
Old 07-10-2014, 08:51 PM
  #10  
Engineer
 
ClaySlayer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Alabama
Posts: 778
Received 42 Likes on 35 Posts
Default

ugh...you shouldn't be putting the truck in 4x4 when on solid enough terrain to cause binding. As others have said it doesn't matter what ratio you have it'll bind.

Ratio depends on what motor you have. If you're 4x4 and going to put a bigger size tire on then I vote 3.73s. Only way I would go 3.55 or even 3.31 is if staying with stock size tires or not towing very much weigh...unless it's the 3.5 EB because of the low end grunt...I talked to a guy at a boat ramp one time that towed a ~25' runabout that weighed about 8,000lbs with a 3.55 EB and said it had plenty of power. I had a 2wd, 5.0, 3.31 rental for a week and it was plenty quick and would've handled a good sized trailer with no problem. Now when you do the math a 3.31 with the stock 2wd tires (~30in) is effectively the same ratio as my FX4 with 33s and 3.73s...plus mine weighs about 800lbs more for the camper shell, crap in the bed,and 4wd components so it makes since that the 3.31 truck I had felt zippy. If it weren't for having 500lbs of crap in my bed plus bigger tires I would've been fine with 3.55s or even 3.31s and when I tow my ~4,000lb boat on the weekend could just lock out 6th and run in 5th if I needed to.

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: Help me pick a new Axle Ratio



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:08 AM.