Topic Sponsor
2015 - 2020 Ford F150 General discussion on the 13th generation Ford F150 truck.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Considering dropping Ecoboost for 5.0

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-22-2015, 06:42 AM
  #21  
Senior Member
 
zx12-iowa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: midwest
Posts: 4,093
Received 646 Likes on 498 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by LRomeroIV
Lol well you would say that because you have the Eco.
You're right both engines have pros and cons but the 5.0 is supposed to have more hp and it sounds way better. Speaking just about performance, I think there's way more power gains to be had with the 5.0 via aftermarket.
I love my ecoboost and it flies, the 3.5 in my dads 15' is an animal as well... And I've driven the 15' 5.0 too, not nearly as much torque but it's still powerful and that coyote definitely howls.
For aftermarket, the Eco with a tune is the most power, unless the 5.0 is supercharged. If you have a quality tune on your Eco, you'd agree.

Op, the 5.0 is a fine engine and gets the job done. Hope you are satisfied with your purchase. Buyers remorse sucks....
Old 01-22-2015, 06:55 AM
  #22  
Senior Member
 
screamineagle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Ohio
Posts: 4,100
Received 353 Likes on 285 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by zx12-iowa
For aftermarket, the Eco with a tune is the most power, unless the 5.0 is supercharged. If you have a quality tune on your Eco, you'd agree. Op, the 5.0 is a fine engine and gets the job done. Hope you are satisfied with your purchase. Buyers remorse sucks....
Who cares about the extra power if your not going to use/need it? Long term reliability would be my #1 concern.
The following users liked this post:
HardcoreOffroading (01-24-2015)
Old 01-22-2015, 07:50 AM
  #23  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Derodeo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Alberta, Canada
Posts: 595
Received 69 Likes on 52 Posts

Default

I look at it as trading superb low-end torque for peace of mind. And peace of mind can be pretty valuable over the 10 or so years I expect to have this truck. I do think the Ecoboost would make an ideal 2 or 3 year lease though.

I find it interesting that the current 3.5 EB is likely soon to be replaced with the new Ecoboost that will be in the 2nd generation Raptor. That one will use a dual-injection system which is a combination of port and direct fuel injection. That should solve the carbon build-up and other issues. Too bad I can't wait for it (or the 10 speed transmission or Sync 3...)

BTW, has anyone deciphered the payload penalty of the EB vs. 5.0? According to the Build and Price it looks like I'll gain 60 lbs of payload by making this change. Not that much but with my configuration every bit counts.

Still unsure as to axle ratio. I feel the 3.73 would give me a little bit of wiggle room should I end up towing more in the future but it's weird how it appears to cost $400 more while the 3.55 is no additional cost on both the EB and 5.0 if you already have the FX4 package (I know it doesn't show this on the Build and Price but it does on the invoice information I have and the dealer confirms it).

Last edited by Derodeo; 01-22-2015 at 08:00 AM.
Old 01-22-2015, 08:33 AM
  #24  
KMACYOYO
 
ducgsxr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: ‘Murica
Posts: 101
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Derodeo
I look at it as trading superb low-end torque for peace of mind. And peace of mind can be pretty valuable over the 10 or so years I expect to have this truck. I do think the Ecoboost would make an ideal 2 or 3 year lease though.

I find it interesting that the current 3.5 EB is likely soon to be replaced with the new Ecoboost that will be in the 2nd generation Raptor. That one will use a dual-injection system which is a combination of port and direct fuel injection. That should solve the carbon build-up and other issues. Too bad I can't wait for it (or the 10 speed transmission or Sync 3...)

BTW, has anyone deciphered the payload penalty of the EB vs. 5.0? According to the Build and Price it looks like I'll gain 60 lbs of payload by making this change. Not that much but with my configuration every bit counts.

Still unsure as to axle ratio. I feel the 3.73 would give me a little bit of wiggle room should I end up towing more in the future but it's weird how it appears to cost $400 more while the 3.55 is no additional cost on both the EB and 5.0 if you already have the FX4 package (I know it doesn't show this on the Build and Price but it does on the invoice information I have and the dealer confirms it).
Good points. I went with 3.73 on my 5.0, and I would do it again
Old 01-22-2015, 08:55 AM
  #25  
Senior Member
 
packplantpath's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 2,964
Received 584 Likes on 404 Posts

Default

I wouldn't have a 5.0 without 3.73. Lots of people like it though. In my opinion it really would benefit from 4.10. YMMV
Old 01-22-2015, 10:31 AM
  #26  
Senior Member
 
CorvetteGuy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 110
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

I will probably go Eco when I get mine.. But a supercharged 5.0 would just be nasty.
Old 01-22-2015, 10:39 AM
  #27  
Senior Member
 
countrysquire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 631
Received 204 Likes on 136 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by packplantpath
YMMV
Yes, literally!
Old 01-22-2015, 01:42 PM
  #28  
Senior Member
 
LRomeroIV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Texas
Posts: 685
Received 53 Likes on 35 Posts
Default

A supercharger is the plan
Old 01-22-2015, 04:14 PM
  #29  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Derodeo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Alberta, Canada
Posts: 595
Received 69 Likes on 52 Posts

Default

Well it's done, changed order to the 5.0 with a 3.73 locking rear.

Another question; why do only the Ecoboost trucks get a front wheel liner?
Old 01-22-2015, 05:32 PM
  #30  
Junior Member
 
itezja's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Derodeo
Thanks for the feedback guys, I guess I have convinced myself the 5.0L is a better choice for me. Still unsure as to the axle ratio, sort of feel that now I've given up on outright performance I may as well take the little bit of gas savings and go for with the 3.55. I actually do tow a fair bit but it is typically only 3000 - 4000 lb trailers. Won't be changing tires unless it is to go to 18" wheels instead of 20".

Now to deal with the sales manager at my dealership - I've gotton the impression he really hates order changes and all I've done previously is drop those sad OEM floor mats.
I would recommend driving examples of both set ups with the gears you are considering. I've driven both and there is definitely a difference in feel between the 5.0 and ecoboost.

As far as the sales manager, I'm always surprised and frustrated at dealerships that make the purchasing/ordering experience less than pleasurable. You are spending thousands on a beautiful machine. You deserve the right to be thorough with your decisions. It amazes me how many people are willing to drop $50k with hardly any research and only a drive around the block. I'm not saying this is you btw.


Quick Reply: Considering dropping Ecoboost for 5.0



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:33 AM.