Topic Sponsor
2015 - 2020 Ford F150 General discussion on the 13th generation Ford F150 truck.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

5.0 Considerations:

Old 01-19-2015, 08:08 AM
  #11  
KMACYOYO
 
ducgsxr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: ‘Murica
Posts: 101
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by packplantpath
365hp is on 87 octane, it does have a few more on 93. But it is rated on 87. Unless it is in a Lincoln.

With vvt, you should run premium on the 5.0 towing as well. It helps.
I've been told by multiple Ford employees that the 3.5 Eco power rating was on Premium. So maybe, maybe not. Your statement of variable valve timing on a production NA engine benefiting from using a higher octane than what is specified for its compression ratio by the manufacturer doesn't hold any water. It's simply not true.

Last edited by ducgsxr; 01-19-2015 at 08:11 AM. Reason: Grammarz
Old 01-19-2015, 08:30 AM
  #12  
Senior Member
 
LSchicago's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 1,300
Received 197 Likes on 150 Posts

Default

A lot of the F150's on the ground & dealer ordered are 5.0's, even though Ford marketing is ignoring them. It's good to know the dealers are not! I will buy another 5.0.
Old 01-19-2015, 08:36 AM
  #13  
Senior Member
 
packplantpath's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 2,964
Received 584 Likes on 404 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ducgsxr

I've been told by multiple Ford employees that the 3.5 Eco power rating was on Premium. So maybe, maybe not. Your statement of variable valve timing on a production NA engine benefiting from using a higher octane than what is specified for its compression ratio by the manufacturer doesn't hold any water. It's simply not true.

I read the manual. It says on 87 octane. No maybe about it.

Feel free to believe what you like regarding higher octane. Variable valve timing is effectively variable compression ratio. It can take advantage of it in the same way it can e85. It isn't as dramatic as on a boosted engine, but it is real. The mustang 5.0, is rated on 93 but will run on 87 all day long with less power. The truck version is rated on 87 but gains power on 93. Ford doesn't publish them likely because it would make the Eco look worse. This is all marketing.

This isn't new, the 6.2 super duty was the same way. More power on premium.

Has anybody seen a dyno for the 15 5.0. I want to see where the power really is instead of speculation.
Old 01-19-2015, 09:00 AM
  #14  
Senior Member
 
msgford's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Illinois
Posts: 360
Received 75 Likes on 55 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by LSchicago
A lot of the F150's on the ground & dealer ordered are 5.0's, even though Ford marketing is ignoring them. It's good to know the dealers are not! I will buy another 5.0.

Huh? The ones I've seen at the dealers are all EB's. My statement is as factual as yours!
Old 01-19-2015, 09:15 AM
  #15  
Senior Member
 
msgford's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Illinois
Posts: 360
Received 75 Likes on 55 Posts

Default

Analysis of the VIN tracking worksheet yields the following:


Of 85 Total Trucks listed:


54 (63.5%) are 3.5 EB's
22 (25.8%) are 5.0 V-8
9 (10.6%) are 2.7 EB's


https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets...mFc/edit#gid=0
Old 01-19-2015, 09:22 AM
  #16  
Senior Member
 
Feathermerchant's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Euless, Tx
Posts: 2,950
Received 398 Likes on 336 Posts

Default

3. The 5.0 is designed to run so efficiently, it is not saddled like most other engines, with an added on EGR (exhaust gas recirculation) system. Another benefit of simplicity in design.

Really? It uses the variable cam timing to achieve EGR with valve overlap.
So it has EGR. Just not in the conventional way.

Yes I like my 5.0
Old 01-19-2015, 11:28 AM
  #17  
Senior Member
 
kbass24emtp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Missouri
Posts: 980
Received 118 Likes on 102 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ducgsxr
I've been told by multiple Ford employees that the 3.5 Eco power rating was on Premium. So maybe, maybe not. Your statement of variable valve timing on a production NA engine benefiting from using a higher octane than what is specified for its compression ratio by the manufacturer doesn't hold any water. It's simply not true.
It has been documented on a dyno that the 5.0 gains about 9 hp on premium gas. The dyno graph in on this site if you want to search for it.
Old 01-19-2015, 12:14 PM
  #18  
KMACYOYO
 
ducgsxr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: ‘Murica
Posts: 101
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by kbass24emtp
It has been documented on a dyno that the 5.0 gains about 9 hp on premium gas. The dyno graph in on this site if you want to search for it.
9 HP for a huge increase in fuel costs? Is that a joke? in a 5,000 lb truck? People don't actually think that is even remotely worth it, do they?
Old 01-19-2015, 12:23 PM
  #19  
Senior Member
 
kbass24emtp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Missouri
Posts: 980
Received 118 Likes on 102 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ducgsxr
9 HP for a huge increase in fuel costs? Is that a joke? in a 5,000 lb truck? People don't actually think that is even remotely worth it, do they?
No, you stated that there was no increase in using premium fuel and I was just pointing out that it was documented that it does. Sorry you were proven wrong internet tough guy.
The following users liked this post:
F1502015 (01-26-2015)
Old 01-19-2015, 12:26 PM
  #20  
SS1
Member
Thread Starter
 
SS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 94
Received 23 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Feathermerchant
3. The 5.0 is designed to run so efficiently, it is not saddled like most other engines, with an added on EGR (exhaust gas recirculation) system. Another benefit of simplicity in design.

Really? It uses the variable cam timing to achieve EGR with valve overlap.
So it has EGR. Just not in the conventional way.

Yes I like my 5.0
You are correct. But the 5.0 does not have an "added on" EGR system with ugly valves and pipes that are in the way and get plugged up. The engineering on the 5.0 deals with the EGR requirement in an elegant and simple fashion. And it doesn't require premium, as was noted. That saved my bacon on a recent family trip to the southwest, and Mexico where all we could find in out of the way locales was 87 grade!

I have been looking, and I can 't find a single published road test on the 2015 5.0 except the Pickups.com one! All the published performance data shows the lower hp e-boost motors being faster than the 5.0. Something is up. We need some honest information here!

Last edited by SS1; 01-19-2015 at 12:29 PM.

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: 5.0 Considerations:



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:57 PM.