5.0 Considerations:
#11
I've been told by multiple Ford employees that the 3.5 Eco power rating was on Premium. So maybe, maybe not. Your statement of variable valve timing on a production NA engine benefiting from using a higher octane than what is specified for its compression ratio by the manufacturer doesn't hold any water. It's simply not true.
Last edited by ducgsxr; 01-19-2015 at 08:11 AM. Reason: Grammarz
#12
A lot of the F150's on the ground & dealer ordered are 5.0's, even though Ford marketing is ignoring them. It's good to know the dealers are not! I will buy another 5.0.
#13
I've been told by multiple Ford employees that the 3.5 Eco power rating was on Premium. So maybe, maybe not. Your statement of variable valve timing on a production NA engine benefiting from using a higher octane than what is specified for its compression ratio by the manufacturer doesn't hold any water. It's simply not true.
I read the manual. It says on 87 octane. No maybe about it.
Feel free to believe what you like regarding higher octane. Variable valve timing is effectively variable compression ratio. It can take advantage of it in the same way it can e85. It isn't as dramatic as on a boosted engine, but it is real. The mustang 5.0, is rated on 93 but will run on 87 all day long with less power. The truck version is rated on 87 but gains power on 93. Ford doesn't publish them likely because it would make the Eco look worse. This is all marketing.
This isn't new, the 6.2 super duty was the same way. More power on premium.
Has anybody seen a dyno for the 15 5.0. I want to see where the power really is instead of speculation.
#14
Senior Member
#15
Senior Member
Analysis of the VIN tracking worksheet yields the following:
Of 85 Total Trucks listed:
54 (63.5%) are 3.5 EB's
22 (25.8%) are 5.0 V-8
9 (10.6%) are 2.7 EB's
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets...mFc/edit#gid=0
Of 85 Total Trucks listed:
54 (63.5%) are 3.5 EB's
22 (25.8%) are 5.0 V-8
9 (10.6%) are 2.7 EB's
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets...mFc/edit#gid=0
#16
Senior Member
3. The 5.0 is designed to run so efficiently, it is not saddled like most other engines, with an added on EGR (exhaust gas recirculation) system. Another benefit of simplicity in design.
Really? It uses the variable cam timing to achieve EGR with valve overlap.
So it has EGR. Just not in the conventional way.
Yes I like my 5.0
Really? It uses the variable cam timing to achieve EGR with valve overlap.
So it has EGR. Just not in the conventional way.
Yes I like my 5.0
#17
Senior Member
I've been told by multiple Ford employees that the 3.5 Eco power rating was on Premium. So maybe, maybe not. Your statement of variable valve timing on a production NA engine benefiting from using a higher octane than what is specified for its compression ratio by the manufacturer doesn't hold any water. It's simply not true.
#18
9 HP for a huge increase in fuel costs? Is that a joke? in a 5,000 lb truck? People don't actually think that is even remotely worth it, do they?
#19
Senior Member
No, you stated that there was no increase in using premium fuel and I was just pointing out that it was documented that it does. Sorry you were proven wrong internet tough guy.
The following users liked this post:
F1502015 (01-26-2015)
#20
3. The 5.0 is designed to run so efficiently, it is not saddled like most other engines, with an added on EGR (exhaust gas recirculation) system. Another benefit of simplicity in design.
Really? It uses the variable cam timing to achieve EGR with valve overlap.
So it has EGR. Just not in the conventional way.
Yes I like my 5.0
Really? It uses the variable cam timing to achieve EGR with valve overlap.
So it has EGR. Just not in the conventional way.
Yes I like my 5.0
I have been looking, and I can 't find a single published road test on the 2015 5.0 except the Pickups.com one! All the published performance data shows the lower hp e-boost motors being faster than the 5.0. Something is up. We need some honest information here!
Last edited by SS1; 01-19-2015 at 12:29 PM.