Topic Sponsor
2015 - 2020 Ford F150 General discussion on the 13th generation Ford F150 truck.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

3.2- liter diesel...

Old 08-11-2014, 01:03 PM
  #1  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Ryan45's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default 3.2- liter diesel...

In the 2015 Transit Van... Why can't this be in the f150, or something close to it?


There’s also a new 3.2-liter inline-five Power Stroke turbo diesel (185 hp/350 lb-ft) based on Ford’s third-generation Duratorq (Puma). It’s been heavily reworked to meet U.S. standards -- the most stringent of which are found in California -- and can run on B20 biodiesel, if desired. Ninety percent of its available torque can be tapped at just 1500 rpm. Each engine is married to a six-speed automatic and is rear-wheel drive.
Read more: http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/...#ixzz3A6V9MOvr
Old 08-11-2014, 04:31 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
harrison14allen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Brenham, TX
Posts: 2,278
Received 108 Likes on 91 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Ryan45
In the 2015 Transit Van... Why can't this be in the f150, or something close to it?


Read more: http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/...#ixzz3A6V9MOvr
I have been wondering the same thing. I'm actually considering a Ram because of the eco diesel
Old 08-11-2014, 05:49 PM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
cerhai's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: northwest
Posts: 437
Received 50 Likes on 33 Posts

Default

let them sell the crap out of the ecoboost motors then they will introduce the small diesel, give it a few more years they will have to, to compete
Old 08-11-2014, 05:58 PM
  #4  
Built Ford Tough
 
Ftruck150's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 2,150
Received 165 Likes on 107 Posts
Default

Everyone on this site here seems to hate the Ram Eco Diesel because it only has 260 hp and doesn't do 0-60 in 4 seconds.

I'm sure the 185hp 5 cylinder diesel would make the F150 the best truck on earth though. Power and cost would become obsolete and it'd suddenly be all about economy, assuming it did better than Ram in that aspect.
The following users liked this post:
130428 (09-09-2014)
Old 08-12-2014, 09:06 AM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
OldFlick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Cape May, NJ
Posts: 458
Received 66 Likes on 54 Posts
Default

I think the lack of entries on this post show lack of interest in light duty diesels, same as Ford marketing discovered. Have had 7 diesel F250's and glad to get away from them.
Old 08-12-2014, 10:19 AM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
Curmudgeon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Pacific NW
Posts: 1,360
Received 333 Likes on 214 Posts
Default

I live in a state where diesel pickups account for ~ 13.6% of vehicle registrations (#5 in the nation in 2012). The owners are a mixed group of big rig wannabes (often leaving their vehicles idling in the parking lot while shopping), sport towers, jacked-up off roaders, and daily drivers. They all have one thing in common though...their trucks contribute a lot of rattling clatter and stink in suburban locales...very annoying. Many seem to enjoy stop light to stop light turbo spooling with clouds of black smoke.

Last edited by Curmudgeon; 08-12-2014 at 01:14 PM.
Old 08-12-2014, 10:22 AM
  #7  
Junior Member
 
CP34's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 26
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Where do you live? 1990?
Old 08-12-2014, 11:06 AM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
Curmudgeon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Pacific NW
Posts: 1,360
Received 333 Likes on 214 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by CP34
Where do you live? 1990?

In a state with many pockets of high unemployment, a statewide high school drop out rate of over 25%, and incomes below the U.S. median, yeah, we're very close.
Old 08-12-2014, 12:54 PM
  #9  
Senior Member
 
MattN03's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Central KY
Posts: 166
Received 18 Likes on 16 Posts

Default

Interesting read on the EcoDiesel first service on Edmunds...I'm not really convinced that diesel is economical enough after paying for $250 for a 8900 mile oil change. Of course, I'm sure there could be some significant dealer service cost markup and wouldn't be quite so bad for the DIYer. I'm also concerned about the cost to replace the polullution control system on a diesel if it fails after the warranty has expired.
Old 08-12-2014, 03:03 PM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
Kansas Transit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Glasco,Ks
Posts: 219
Received 22 Likes on 17 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by MattN03
Interesting read on the EcoDiesel first service on Edmunds...I'm not really convinced that diesel is economical enough after paying for $250 for a 8900 mile oil change. Of course, I'm sure there could be some significant dealer service cost markup and wouldn't be quite so bad for the DIYer. I'm also concerned about the cost to replace the polullution control system on a diesel if it fails after the warranty has expired.




I think a lot of this eco diesel is hype, not saying it doesn't get good mileage, but forever people have been lead to believe that the only way to good fuel economy in a truck was a diesel.


For Class 5 and up vehicles you can't beat a diesel, but small cars and pickups that are running diesels for fuel economy are starting to have to deal with gas motors that are stealing some of the diesel's economy traits.


A gas motor with high pressure direct injection, and a turbo are getting VERY close to what was previously diesel only economy, and they do it with a lot less maintenance costs, and at a substantially lower initial purchase cost.


Just my take on it.
The following 3 users liked this post by Kansas Transit:
Aquapools (08-14-2014), hydro (08-14-2014), teecuzbruh (09-09-2014)

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: 3.2- liter diesel...



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:39 PM.