Topic Sponsor
2015 - 2020 Ford F150 General discussion on the 13th generation Ford F150 truck.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

2015 F150 Engine Specs

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-15-2014, 12:18 AM
  #1  
Got a 5.0L now 👌
Thread Starter
 
Canadian Ecoboost's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Manitoba Canada
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default 2015 F150 Engine Specs

Some crazy numbers going around about the output on the new 2.7tt, the 5.0, and 3.5tt, some as high as 440hp on the 3.5tt. Anyone hearing anything solid on these engines yet?
Old 01-15-2014, 03:38 AM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
svt2205's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Weld, Maine
Posts: 339
Received 51 Likes on 48 Posts

Default

All the numbers you're hearing about are speculation. Ford hasn't released HP/TQ or MPG information for the 2015 yet. It will be a while before those are available.
The following users liked this post:
BCMIF150 (01-15-2014)
Old 01-15-2014, 08:59 AM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
Ssls6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Dallas/San Jose
Posts: 816
Received 98 Likes on 79 Posts

Default

Yeah, a lot of crazy numbers thrown about. I personally think Ford won't change the existing engine numbers too much. GM has their 6.2L now that markets 460 ft-lbs, Dodge has their 6.4L hemi that markets 430 ft-lbs. I would guess Ford will split the difference and up the boost to be at 440ish in torque. That would pin the HP at around 385.

The problem Ford will have is the Chevy 6.2L mpg is 15 & 21 mpg (city/highway 2wd). The existing 3.5L is 16 & 22 mpg (city/highway 2wd). If they push all the way to best Chevy in the torque department they will probably end up matching chevy in mpg. The weight loss will definitely help and maybe lets them match Chevy's torque and still claim best mpg.

I say there is no way you'll see 440hp on the 3.5L. From a marketing standpoint, they won't want to change Dennis Leary's script (most capable, best mileage, blah blah blah).
Old 01-15-2014, 09:57 AM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
2012platinum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: hattiesburg,mississippi
Posts: 3,152
Received 231 Likes on 213 Posts
Default

I love my Eco, but I can't believe ford is not offering the 6.2 with the new trucks. The biggest (displacement) engine we have is the 5.0. I understand the direction ford is going, but taking your biggest engine and adding another small engine in a full size pickup is confusing to me.
Old 01-15-2014, 10:07 AM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
GriffFX4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: GA
Posts: 1,699
Received 348 Likes on 234 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 2012platinum
I love my Eco, but I can't believe ford is not offering the 6.2 with the new trucks. The biggest (displacement) engine we have is the 5.0. I understand the direction ford is going, but taking your biggest engine and adding another small engine in a full size pickup is confusing to me.
There may be another engine in the works we have not heard about because its not ready yet. Some think it may be some type of eco diesel.
Old 01-15-2014, 10:07 AM
  #6  
Beer Gut Extraordinaire

 
HCFX2013's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Canada
Posts: 17,369
Received 2,102 Likes on 1,317 Posts

Default

Ford discontinuing the 6.2 makes a ton of sense. With the truck being 700lbs lighter, the 5.0 will be just as fast. The 6.2 uses too much fuel, and contradicts Ford's initiative for better gas mileage across the board.
The following 4 users liked this post by HCFX2013:
FJRunner (02-21-2014), Grandpa's Grocery Getter (01-17-2014), RRSport (01-15-2014), sgtpatiolantern (04-25-2014)
Old 01-15-2014, 10:11 AM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
2012platinum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: hattiesburg,mississippi
Posts: 3,152
Received 231 Likes on 213 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by HardcoreFXFour
Ford discontinuing the 6.2 makes a ton of sense. With the truck being 700lbs lighter, the 5.0 will be just as fast. The 6.2 uses too much fuel, and contradicts Ford's initiative for better gas mileage across the board.
Like I was saying hardcore, I understand the direction they are going, but I still think it should be an option. Just my opinion. I was planning on getting one when I get a new truck. Guess ill have to buy a used '14 when the time comes. Lol
Old 01-15-2014, 10:16 AM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
11screw50's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Maine
Posts: 2,577
Received 482 Likes on 304 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by GriffFX4
There may be another engine in the works we have not heard about because its not ready yet. Some think it may be some type of eco diesel.
isn't that what Fiat...errr Dodge....errr Ram is calling their small diesel in their half-ton? EcoDiesel.

Seeing rumors of the 3.2 I5 diesel as a possibility but those run ~350lb-ft and ~200hp from what I've read.

Last edited by 11screw50; 01-15-2014 at 10:21 AM.
Old 01-15-2014, 10:20 AM
  #9  
Senior Member
 
GriffFX4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: GA
Posts: 1,699
Received 348 Likes on 234 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 11screw50
isn't that what Fiat...errr Dodge....errr Ram is calling their small diesel in their half-ton? EcoDiesel.
Yeah, I was meaning something similar to the Dodge diesel
Old 01-15-2014, 10:38 AM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
modru2004's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 284
Received 57 Likes on 30 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 2012platinum
Like I was saying hardcore, I understand the direction they are going, but I still think it should be an option. Just my opinion. I was planning on getting one when I get a new truck. Guess ill have to buy a used '14 when the time comes. Lol
2016 cafe requirements.

and i quote "The truck standard has to rise from 23.5 mpg to 28.8".

now do you understand? ford can't offer a large v8 that gets horrible mpg if they plan on meeting the requirements.
The following users liked this post:
TurboSalsa (01-15-2014)


Quick Reply: 2015 F150 Engine Specs



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:14 AM.