Topic Sponsor
2015 - 2020 Ford F150 General discussion on the 13th generation Ford F150 truck.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

2.7 mpg/performance

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-24-2015, 08:34 PM
  #401  
Senior Member
 
nihilus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 644
Received 86 Likes on 66 Posts
Default

Um the missing 3 gallons could have been mostly on the top you know. There is ALOT of room left over after the pump 'clicks'
Old 03-24-2015, 08:50 PM
  #402  
Senior Member
 
kltk1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Parsippany, NJ
Posts: 130
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

Only the poster could answer that for sure. It's possible he filled it to the neck as well.
Old 03-24-2015, 08:56 PM
  #403  
Member
 
brettdanger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 42
Received 14 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by BoozeDaily
3 miles to empty. Elephant *****.
That isnt normal for me, but I wanted to have my first 600 mile tank. I was bound and determined to get those 600.
Old 03-24-2015, 08:58 PM
  #404  
Member
 
brettdanger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 42
Received 14 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by nihilus
Um the missing 3 gallons could have been mostly on the top you know. There is ALOT of room left over after the pump 'clicks'
Not sure I follow your logic, if it clicked too soon that would only make the truck gauge more inaccurate as I would have filled even more. In both tanks I filled to the click and stopped. These two fill ups were at different locations.
Old 03-24-2015, 09:09 PM
  #405  
Senior Member
 
nihilus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 644
Received 86 Likes on 66 Posts
Default

Let me put it this way, I once ran my '13 down to 20 miles or about 1 gallon. I still managed to fill up 34.5 gallons by "topping off". Temps were mild so I wasn't worried about expansion and also I was awarded with '700+ miles to empty badge' :p This means there is at most 0.5 gallons of "idiot reserve" beyond when the truck says 0 miles to empty. A half a gallon sloshing around is not much protection for this large fuel system.
Old 03-26-2015, 02:03 PM
  #406  
F250>F150


iTrader: (2)
 
BoozeDaily's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Midlothian, TX
Posts: 2,232
Received 917 Likes on 483 Posts

Default

[MENTION=202170]brettdanger[/MENTION] are you wearing a calculator watch in that picture? I haven't seen one of those in forever! You know phones will do that now, right?
Old 03-26-2015, 10:12 PM
  #407  
Member
 
brettdanger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 42
Received 14 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by BoozeDaily
[MENTION=202170]brettdanger[/MENTION] are you wearing a calculator watch in that picture? I haven't seen one of those in forever! You know phones will do that now, right?

[MENTION=198822]BoozeDaily[/MENTION] HaHa, close but it is a little more modern. Android Smar****ch, specifically Sony Smar****ch 3.
Old 03-26-2015, 10:50 PM
  #408  
Senior Member

 
dodgehemi0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 800
Received 147 Likes on 85 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ecotow
The GMC 6.2 eight speed has more hp and torque than eb 3.5 and is getting as good mpg. I was hoping the 3.5 eb in the lighter truck would be getting better mpg.
I can attest to that I had the new 6.2 in the 6speed and my lifetime average was 19 over 15000 miles. It blows my ecoboost away in MPG. My 14 Eco is 16.4 and still going down at 15000 miles. Same size truck and similar fears 3.42 in the GMC Denali and 3.55 in my Eco.
Old 03-27-2015, 12:52 AM
  #409  
Senior Member
 
RevX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Canada
Posts: 262
Received 33 Likes on 23 Posts
Default

Okay have missed this but are guys running 33" and 35" tires on this engine? I ask because I'm looking at a new truck and I would definitely be putting on 33" tires. I'm wondering if it would kill the mpg on the 2.7 l and if it would feel sluggish.
Old 03-27-2015, 08:49 AM
  #410  
Senior Member
 
ddeevers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: NE AR
Posts: 520
Received 88 Likes on 60 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RevX
Okay have missed this but are guys running 33" and 35" tires on this engine? I ask because I'm looking at a new truck and I would definitely be putting on 33" tires. I'm wondering if it would kill the mpg on the 2.7 l and if it would feel sluggish.
Of course it would. Why not get the 5.0 and 3.73 then you get good mpg and can run the tires you want. Exactly what is the advantage of the 2.7EB? Looks like consumer reports will disclaim the real world mpg rating AGAIN.


Quick Reply: 2.7 mpg/performance



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:14 PM.