Topic Sponsor
2015 - 2020 Ford F150 General discussion on the 13th generation Ford F150 truck.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

2.7 eco vs 3.5 eco: which one?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-09-2016, 07:59 AM
  #1  
Member
Thread Starter
 
nanetteschimpf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 32
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts

Default 2.7 eco vs 3.5 eco: which one?

I drive a 2010 Ford Flex Limited and do some media and public relations work for Ford. Love the products and just helped my brother in law buy a 2015 XL Screw 2.7L 5.5 bed 4x4 FX4. I've fallen in love with it and am looking at a 2015 or 2016 XLT or Lariat. My struggle is: which ecoboost engine? I will likely get the RWD as I don't off road, my son has a 2000 7.3L diesel Scab F-250 so I have access to a 4x4 whenever i need it.

Both the 2.7L and 3.5L ecoboost engines are twin turbo, the 3.5L tows way more but I don't need to tow anything (though having something that tows more isn't shabby if it's a better, more reliable or better MPG engine). I am a speedy lady and enjoy scooting and great handling vehicles. And love the functionality of a truck.

Would love your thoughts!
Old 03-09-2016, 08:03 AM
  #2  
Save the Manuals!
 
gatorblue92's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Delaware
Posts: 1,725
Received 1,058 Likes on 492 Posts
Default

If you aren't planning on towing anything super heavy I would go with the 2.7. My fuel economy is around 18-19 with mostly city driving and I'm very pleased with the preformance.
Old 03-09-2016, 08:30 AM
  #3  
Member
iTrader: (1)
 
DarrylJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Conklin NY
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

Go with the 3.5. If you ever decide to buy a camper of other big trailer for whatever reason your covered!
Old 03-09-2016, 08:51 AM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
Ricktwuhk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: SE Michigan
Posts: 14,966
Received 5,989 Likes on 3,553 Posts

Default

Discussed often on the forum. If you don't tow, then there is no reason to buy the 3.5.
Old 03-09-2016, 08:53 AM
  #5  
Member
 
mach1dmb!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

The 2.7 is faster
Old 03-09-2016, 09:01 AM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
Rexey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Southern NH
Posts: 1,024
Received 149 Likes on 119 Posts
Default

2.7. If you decide 3.5 wait till the 17s come out. Ordering will be close to aug 15. The new 3.5 ecoboost gets redesigned with the improvements the 2.7 got in 15.
The following users liked this post:
News in (03-09-2016)
Old 03-09-2016, 09:27 AM
  #7  
Member
 
goheels28144's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Isn't the 2.7 a brand new engine, though? If so, not sure I'd do that just for reliability concerns. The 3.5 has been around for a pretty good while now.
Old 03-09-2016, 09:35 AM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
Rheimy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Canada
Posts: 258
Received 60 Likes on 43 Posts

Default

If you don't tow, and want better MPG, it's a no brainer. 2.7 all the way.
Old 03-09-2016, 09:39 AM
  #9  
Senior Member
 
Rexey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Southern NH
Posts: 1,024
Received 149 Likes on 119 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by goheels28144
Isn't the 2.7 a brand new engine, though? If so, not sure I'd do that just for reliability concerns. The 3.5 has been around for a pretty good while now.
they made the 2.7 different than the 3.5 because of the weaknesses found on the 3.5. Dual timing chain instead of one really really long one... Many a 3.5 had issues with stretching. Also there's been no large issues with many members having that engine. Easy to suggest it.
Old 03-09-2016, 09:45 AM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
Jack Anthony Rook's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 318
Received 67 Likes on 51 Posts
Default

I was in your shoes. I got crap mpg in my Raptor and wanted something better. I just dropped my life savings on a house and will be working 6 days a week for the foreseeable future. I love going camping, Dirtbike riding, off-roading. But the REALITY of life caught up to me. I won't have much time to do that unless I hit the lotto or marry a sugar momma(both of which WILL NOT HAPPEN).

So with that said I looked at things realistically. Let's narrow down the engines. Am I going to be towing a camper? No. Can a 2.7 handle a little Uhaul across town? Yup. Next, will I be off-roading? Nope. So I don't need 4wd. I live in flat Southern California. 50/50 Palm Springs/Los Angeles. Next do I need the fully loaded interior? Nope. Don't live where it's 12 degrees so don't need heated seats. Don't need factory nav(although it would've been nice). Use my phone LOL. So The only upgrade I wanted were the captain seats. So I got a 2wd, 2.7 screw with captain seats and saved LITERALLY THOUSANDS by just thinking rationally. And I'm getting phenomenal gas milage. Couldn't be happier. I'd love the v8 rumble but I love the v6 economy! And my 2.7 is fast as **** when I want it to be!!


Quick Reply: 2.7 eco vs 3.5 eco: which one?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:29 PM.