Topic Sponsor
2015 - 2020 Ford F150 General discussion on the 13th generation Ford F150 truck.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

2.5" level in front, 2" block in rear, 1.5" FG wheel adapters, & 285/65R20 KO2s

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-23-2016, 02:16 PM
  #11  
Member
Thread Starter
 
snoftall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Canada
Posts: 125
Received 32 Likes on 15 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Skees
I have a very similar setup, but running the boss coilovers with a little more than 2.5" inch lift. My wheels are a 20x9 with a +12 offset. Before I put the Ford OEM mud flaps on I didn't have any rubbing, now with them on I rub at full tilt in reverse and sometimes at full tilt going forward. I am still trying to decide if it is too much of an issue for me if I can do some trimming. So far I have used it like this for 500 miles and it isn't terrible. Here is a picture of it before mudflaps.
Thanks for the info!

I'm fairly confident that +12 offset is roughly the same as stock wheels + 1.5" spacer.

Are you able to snap a few pictures showing it rubbing? And maybe a picture or two, from the side showing the clearance between the flap and the tire when the wheels are straight?
Old 02-23-2016, 06:16 PM
  #12  
F250>F150


iTrader: (2)
 
BoozeDaily's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Midlothian, TX
Posts: 2,232
Received 917 Likes on 483 Posts

Default

Stock wheels are +44, 1.5" spacers are roughly 38mm, leaving you with a +6 offset.

I'm no expert and I don't have mudflaps, but I'm guessing that if I were to put them on mine with my current set up, at full lock in reverse and uneven ground they would catch the mudflaps. Maybe just rub, maybe rip them off. I don't know for sure - and I have 275/65/20 KO2s, 1.5" spacers, stock wheels, 2.5" up front and 2.25" in the rear.
The following users liked this post:
snoftall (02-23-2016)
Old 02-23-2016, 06:31 PM
  #13  
F250>F150


iTrader: (2)
 
BoozeDaily's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Midlothian, TX
Posts: 2,232
Received 917 Likes on 483 Posts

Default

Here are some pictures for reference. I'll reiterate that I have 275/65/20, so the 285/65/20 would be about a half inch wider and half inch larger in diameter than mine.

First image is the driver's side tire turned to the counter clockwise (left). It's not turned the whole way because I didn't have anybody to hold it in that position.

Second image is the passenger side tire turned clockwise (right) with my finger as a reference for the space between the tire and rear crash bar.

Third image is the same only a better reference- the tire is touching my finger on one side and the crash bar is touching my finger on the other side - maybe 1/2" clearance.

Last image is the passenger side tire turned about halfway giving a reference of about how much space there is between the tire and wheel well.

*Edit: Sorry for the rotated pictures. Don't know how to turn them the right way.
Attached Images     
The following users liked this post:
snoftall (02-23-2016)
Old 02-23-2016, 07:23 PM
  #14  
Member
 
Skees's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Loveland, CO
Posts: 42
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Here is a picture of mine that I just took. It will sometimes rub lightly in reverse, but if the suspension is binding it all it will definitely rub more. Second is drivers side third is the passenger side.
Attached Thumbnails 2.5" level in front, 2" block in rear, 1.5" FG wheel adapters, & 285/65R20 KO2s-img_0861a.jpg   2.5" level in front, 2" block in rear, 1.5" FG wheel adapters, & 285/65R20 KO2s-img_0858a.jpg   2.5" level in front, 2" block in rear, 1.5" FG wheel adapters, & 285/65R20 KO2s-img_0859a.jpg  
The following users liked this post:
snoftall (02-23-2016)
Old 02-23-2016, 08:21 PM
  #15  
Member
Thread Starter
 
snoftall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Canada
Posts: 125
Received 32 Likes on 15 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by BoozeDaily
Here are some pictures for reference. I'll reiterate that I have 275/65/20, so the 285/65/20 would be about a half inch wider and half inch larger in diameter than mine.

First image is the driver's side tire turned to the counter clockwise (left). It's not turned the whole way because I didn't have anybody to hold it in that position.

Second image is the passenger side tire turned clockwise (right) with my finger as a reference for the space between the tire and rear crash bar.

Third image is the same only a better reference- the tire is touching my finger on one side and the crash bar is touching my finger on the other side - maybe 1/2" clearance.

Last image is the passenger side tire turned about halfway giving a reference of about how much space there is between the tire and wheel well.

*Edit: Sorry for the rotated pictures. Don't know how to turn them the right way.
Thanks for the pics; they're a huge help! The one with your finger in it as a reference really makes it easier to see how close they come. It seems that the setup I was going to run will mostly likely rub the mudflaps, which is a bummer
Old 02-23-2016, 08:23 PM
  #16  
Member
Thread Starter
 
snoftall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Canada
Posts: 125
Received 32 Likes on 15 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Skees
Here is a picture of mine that I just took. It will sometimes rub lightly in reverse, but if the suspension is binding it all it will definitely rub more. Second is drivers side third is the passenger side.
Well this confirms it I guess; they'll rub. And I think you're right; if the suspension travels at all when the wheels are cut, it looks like there is a good chance that one of the lugs in the wheel could catch the edge of the mudflap and tear it clear.

Thanks for adding these pics!



Quick Reply: 2.5" level in front, 2" block in rear, 1.5" FG wheel adapters, & 285/65R20 KO2s



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:00 PM.