Topic Sponsor
1987 - 1996 F150 Still running strong! Talk about your 8th and 9th generation Ford F150 trucks.

Mustang 302 vs. F150 302

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-20-2008, 12:58 AM
  #1  
Jack of All Trades
Thread Starter
 
TayZ776's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: California
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question Mustang 302 vs. F150 302

Ok so im wondering what the difference is between a 86 - 93 era mustang 5.0L 302 and a 87 - 93 ford f150 5.0L 302 besides the intake manifold whats the difference? I want to know because i can find performance parts for the mustangs 5.0L and if its pretty much the same engine i can use it on the f150's 5.0L.
Old 03-20-2008, 07:45 AM
  #2  
NGM
Resident A-hole
 
NGM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Tallahassee
Posts: 4,098
Likes: 0
Received 31 Likes on 22 Posts

Default

Heads can be put on. You need F150 headers. The cams are not interchangeable without alot of modification. The firing order is diffrent from a Mustang to a F150. You will have to get a cam for a non HO motor. I do not remember when they started putting roller motors in the F150. I don't think it was 86 or 87.
Old 03-20-2008, 10:36 AM
  #3  
Jack of All Trades
Thread Starter
 
TayZ776's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: California
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

oh alright. so the heads are pretty much the same for both engines then?
Old 03-20-2008, 12:15 PM
  #4  
Going Postal!!
 
04Screw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 363
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by TayZ776
oh alright. so the heads are pretty much the same for both engines then?
E7TE is the head you want. I believe that head came from the trucks, and in 87 they started using them on the 5.0L
Old 03-20-2008, 06:48 PM
  #5  
Jack of All Trades
Thread Starter
 
TayZ776's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: California
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Ok cool, so in reality theres not much difference :/ thats what i thought.
Old 03-21-2008, 11:59 AM
  #6  
Rollin'
 
L.Jimmy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: San Antonio,TX
Posts: 200
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by TayZ776
Ok cool, so in reality theres not much difference :/ thats what i thought.


i wouldnt jump into it yet. i would wait for more opinions..also www.wikipedia.org is a good tool. look under ford engines and it will tell you what kind of engines were used for what years.
Old 03-21-2008, 01:50 PM
  #7  
Junior Member
 
kuskye25's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

a mustang engine has some forged internals i was told my 90 f150 didnt have anything forged, i know the intakes, and TB are different, and i think the heads are to "not positive on the heads though but they look different", all in all pretty different engines in my book....

i have a 88mustang gt 5spd, i love the fox bodies
Old 03-24-2008, 03:00 PM
  #8  
Member
 
UJRock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: small dwelling with one stop light
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Are intakes simular? (Manifolds)
Old 03-24-2008, 03:31 PM
  #9  
Going Postal!!
 
04Screw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 363
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by UJRock
Are intakes simular? (Manifolds)
No very different
Old 03-24-2008, 04:08 PM
  #10  
I Voted For Bill and Opus
 
transmaster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Cheyenne, Wyoming
Posts: 2,040
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts

Default

One thing I learned over at the Cougar site (I have a 78 Cougar XR7) is the ports on the heads are different between the engines equipped with two and four barrel carb's. They engine guru's over there point out a four barrel carb' will not work well on a two barrel head.

I have always thought it would be cool to fit a modern Ford GT40 V8 in an F150. This is, of course, a highly modified 5.4 L V8, DOHC 4 valve per cylinder, dry sump, with a twin screw supercharger putting out 550 hp, and 500 fp of torque. Yes I know you could build up a 460 with much more horse power for mucho less money but you would not have nearly as big a "cool factor"


The GT40 V8, drool, covet, Look at all of those pulleys you can fondle, think of stroking the supercharger........does this make me an enginophile

Last edited by transmaster; 07-09-2008 at 06:09 PM.


Quick Reply: Mustang 302 vs. F150 302



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:27 AM.