Topic Sponsor
1987 - 1996 F150 Still running strong! Talk about your 8th and 9th generation Ford F150 trucks.

Moog 824, 844 or 844s

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-15-2014, 11:43 AM
  #21  
1994 F150 XLT 5.8L 2wd
 
fltdriver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Iowa
Posts: 2,150
Received 247 Likes on 237 Posts
Default

I had the shock out (changed them) tie rod off (did wheel bearings and ball joints too) stood on the rotor and lifted up on the wheel well, still had 3" above mount. Though I only weigh 145lbs so that may have something to do with it.
Old 10-15-2014, 11:47 AM
  #22  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Chris_1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 5,811
Received 708 Likes on 671 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by mattbarron94
I have the 844S and I'll warn you, unless your rear is sagging it will not level your truck. Also I think you have the same front suspension as me (94 reg cab long bed) and the 844S does not fit properly in the seat. It's too big. It works just fine, but every shop you go too to get the camber adjusted will laugh at you and tell you that your spring is in upside down. I'll get pictures to show you what I mean after Forest Ecology class is out.
I had heard something about fitment issues on the 844S. Thanks for the heads up.
Old 10-15-2014, 12:49 PM
  #23  
1994 F150 XLT 5.8L 2wd
 
fltdriver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Iowa
Posts: 2,150
Received 247 Likes on 237 Posts
Default

Sorry for semi-hijacking, what I was going to originally say was I got the 824 in, also put coil over shock monroe sensa track and between them I'm within 1/2-3/4" of being level. If I still had regular shocks in back I'm sure I would be level, if I let the air out of the rear shocks it sits about 1/4" lower in the back than front but with the min. of 20psi that they recommend is where I get the 1/2-3/4" level.
Old 10-15-2014, 07:33 PM
  #24  
Senior Member
 
truckie1885's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 263
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by mattbarron94
I have the 844S and I'll warn you, unless your rear is sagging it will not level your truck. Also I think you have the same front suspension as me (94 reg cab long bed) and the 844S does not fit properly in the seat. It's too big. It works just fine, but every shop you go too to get the camber adjusted will laugh at you and tell you that your spring is in upside down. I'll get pictures to show you what I mean after Forest Ecology class is out.
I had a very different outcome than you. Mine fit perfect and the alignment was not a problem. Also it lifted the front higher than the rear. Had to put a bigger block in the rear to bring it to level
Old 10-16-2014, 06:51 AM
  #25  
Formerly "the_breeze"
 
Mista_Breeze's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Canton, OH
Posts: 575
Received 12 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

What cab, bed, motor, and drivetrain do all of you guys have? There seems to be a lot of different results here from the same parts.

Post your truck info, springs, and results:

96 2wd, standard cab/long bed, 4.9. I used the 824s and it brought the front up about 3 inches. Sits just a hair lower than the rear.
Old 10-16-2014, 07:38 AM
  #26  
Senior Member
 
truckie1885's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 263
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

Extended cab long bed 5.0 4x4
Old 10-16-2014, 10:23 AM
  #27  
mattbarron94
 
mattbarron94's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Little Elm, Texas
Posts: 736
Received 30 Likes on 24 Posts

Default

94 reg cab long bed 2wd 4.9 I sit about an inch lower in the front. I used the 844S, at least that's what I ordered.
Old 10-16-2014, 10:57 AM
  #28  
Senior Member
 
clarkbre's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Snohomish, WA
Posts: 836
Received 356 Likes on 227 Posts

Default

Truck: 4x4, 5.8L w/ AC, auto transmission, Supercab/shortbox.
Suspension Mods: Moog CC824 springs in the front. Factory 2" blocks in the rear.
Wheels/tires: OEM Ford 15x7.5" polished alloys, 4" backspacing. 31x10.50r15 Falken Rocky Mountain AT tires. No rubbing.
Stance: Sits within 1/4" of level measuring from the ground to the top of the fender arch. (Note: Rear looks slightly lower due to previous wheels/tires and canopy on bed)



Old 10-17-2014, 06:45 AM
  #29  
Formerly "the_breeze"
 
Mista_Breeze's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Canton, OH
Posts: 575
Received 12 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

The pattern im seeing is that the 824s seem to level MORE than the 844s, regardless of cab/motor? Maybe the 844s support more weight but it seems like maybe they compress more? Anybody else notice this?
Old 10-17-2014, 06:49 AM
  #30  
1994 F150 XLT 5.8L 2wd
 
fltdriver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Iowa
Posts: 2,150
Received 247 Likes on 237 Posts
Default

} 94 { Standard Cab } 8ft bed { 5.8L } 2wd Auto { Monroe Sensa Track load assist front shocks } 824 Springs { Stock size tire }

Front is right below 35" center of wheel well
Rear is barely above 35.5" center of wheel well


Quick Reply: Moog 824, 844 or 844s



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:47 PM.